mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Residual Q-Networks for Value Function Factorizing in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2205.15245 ↗First posted 30 May 2022cs.LG cs.MAcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) is useful in many problems that require the cooperation and coordination of multiple agents. Learning optimal policies using reinforcement learning in a multi-agent setting can be very difficult as the number of agents increases. Recent solutions such as Value Decomposition Networks (VDN), QMIX, QTRAN and QPLEX adhere to the centralized training and decentralized execution scheme and perform factorization of the joint action-value functions. However, these methods still suffer from increased environmental complexity, and at times fail to converge in a stable manner. We propose a novel concept of Residual Q-Networks (RQNs) for MARL, which learns to transform the individual Q-value trajectories in a way that preserves the Individual-Global-Max criteria (IGM), but is more robust in factorizing action-value functions. The RQN acts as an auxiliary network that accelerates convergence and will become obsolete as the agents reach the training objectives. The performance of the proposed method is compared against several state-of-the-art techniques such as QPLEX, QMIX, QTRAN and VDN, in a range of multi-agent cooperative tasks. The results illustrate that the proposed method, in general, converges faster, with increased stability and shows robust performance in a wider family of environments. The improvements in results are more prominent in environments with severe punishments for non-cooperative behaviours and especially in the absence of complete state information during training time.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2022.

Builds on

19 of 34 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
  3. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,558
  4. 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 751
  5. 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 708
  6. 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 597
  7. 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 575
  8. 2019QTRAN: Learning to Factorize with Transformation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 379
  9. 2016Learning Multiagent Communication with Backpropagationcited by 366
  10. 2020QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-Learningcited by 270
  11. 2018Actor-Attention-Critic for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 261
  12. 2018TarMAC: Targeted Multi-Agent Communicationcited by 208
7 more
  1. 2020Weighted QMIX: Expanding Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 197
  2. 2015Multiagent Cooperation and Competition with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 184
  3. 2018CM3: Cooperative Multi-goal Multi-stage Multi-agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 31
  4. 2019Learning to solve the credit assignment problemcited by 27
  5. 2018Multiagent Soft Q-Learningcited by 26
  6. 2019Value Propagation for Decentralized Networked Deep Multi-agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 19
  7. 2019A New Framework for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning -- Centralized Training and Exploration with Decentralized Execution via Policy Distillationcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

3 papers.