mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Approximate Conditional Coverage & Calibration via Neural Model Approximations

arXiv 2205.14310 ↗First posted 28 May 2022cs.LG cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A typical desideratum for quantifying the uncertainty from a classification model as a prediction set is class-conditional singleton set calibration. That is, such sets should map to the output of well-calibrated selective classifiers, matching the observed frequencies of similar instances. Recent works proposing adaptive and localized conformal p-values for deep networks do not guarantee this behavior, nor do they achieve it empirically. Instead, we use the strong signals for prediction reliability from KNN-based approximations of Transformer networks to construct data-driven partitions for Mondrian Conformal Predictors, which are treated as weak selective classifiers that are then calibrated via a new Inductive Venn Predictor, the Venn-ADMIT Predictor. The resulting selective classifiers are well-calibrated, in a conservative but practically useful sense for a given threshold. They are inherently robust to changes in the proportions of the data partitions, and straightforward conservative heuristics provide additional robustness to covariate shifts. We compare and contrast to the quantities produced by recent Conformal Predictors on several representative and challenging natural language processing classification tasks, including class-imbalanced and distribution-shifted settings.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2022.

Builds on

19 of 38 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  4. 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 792
  5. 2019Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Datacited by 439
  6. 2020Classification with Valid and Adaptive Coveragecited by 396
  7. 2020Uncertainty Sets for Image Classifiers using Conformal Predictioncited by 366
  8. 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 364
  9. 2013One Billion Word Benchmark for Measuring Progress in Statistical Language Modelingcited by 308
  10. 2016Least Ambiguous Set-Valued Classifiers with Bounded Error Levelscited by 272
  11. 2019Evaluating Protein Transfer Learning with TAPEcited by 231
  12. 2019SemEval-2017 Task 4: Sentiment Analysis in Twittercited by 210
7 more
  1. 2021Localized Conformal Prediction: A Generalized Inference Framework for Conformal Predictioncited by 114
  2. 2021Distribution-free uncertainty quantification for classification under label shiftcited by 101
  3. 2021Top-label calibration and multiclass-to-binary reductionscited by 46
  4. 2015Large-scale probabilistic predictors with and without guarantees of validitycited by 18
  5. 2016Compositional Sequence Labeling Models for Error Detection in Learner Writingcited by 16
  6. 2019Detecting Local Insights from Global Labels: Supervised & Zero-Shot Sequence Labeling via a Convolutional Decompositioncited by 5
  7. 2020Exemplar Auditing for Multi-Label Biomedical Text Classificationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.