mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

An Empirical Study on Distribution Shift Robustness From the Perspective of Pre-Training and Data Augmentation

arXiv 2205.12753 ↗First posted 25 May 2022cs.CV cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The performance of machine learning models under distribution shift has been the focus of the community in recent years. Most of current methods have been proposed to improve the robustness to distribution shift from the algorithmic perspective, i.e., designing better training algorithms to help the generalization in shifted test distributions. This paper studies the distribution shift problem from the perspective of pre-training and data augmentation, two important factors in the practice of deep learning that have not been systematically investigated by existing work. By evaluating seven pre-trained models, including ResNets and ViT's with self-supervision and supervision mode, on five important distribution-shift datasets, from WILDS and DomainBed benchmarks, with five different learning algorithms, we provide the first comprehensive empirical study focusing on pre-training and data augmentation. With our empirical result obtained from 1,330 models, we provide the following main observations: 1) ERM combined with data augmentation can achieve state-of-the-art performance if we choose a proper pre-trained model respecting the data property; 2) specialized algorithms further improve the robustness on top of ERM when handling a specific type of distribution shift, e.g., GroupDRO for spurious correlation and CORAL for large-scale out-of-distribution data; 3) Comparing different pre-training modes, architectures and data sizes, we provide novel observations about pre-training on distribution shift, which sheds light on designing or selecting pre-training strategy for different kinds of distribution shifts. In summary, our empirical study provides a comprehensive baseline for a wide range of pre-training models fine-tuned with data augmentation, which potentially inspires research exploiting the power of pre-training and data augmentation in the future of distribution shift study.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 53 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2022.

Builds on

53 of 67 references.

References · 53

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  5. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  6. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  7. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  8. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  9. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
  10. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  11. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,287
  12. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
38 more
  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  2. 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,917
  3. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
  4. 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,616
  5. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
  6. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
  7. 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,331
  8. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
  9. 2016Deep CORAL: Correlation Alignment for Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 1,200
  10. 2017Deep Hashing Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1,188
  11. 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,054
  12. 2017Deeper, Broader and Artier Domain Generalizationcited by 986
  13. 2020Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)cited by 742
  14. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
  15. 2018Recognition in Terra Incognitacited by 658
  16. 2021ImageNet-21K Pretraining for the Massescited by 613
  17. 2014Deep Domain Confusion: Maximizing for Domain Invariancecited by 600
  18. 2021How to train your ViT? Data, Augmentation, and Regularization in Vision Transformerscited by 569
  19. 2015Causal inference using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervalscited by 536
  20. 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 523
  21. 2021Towards Out-Of-Distribution Generalization: A Surveycited by 436
  22. 2017Functional Map of the Worldcited by 338
  23. 2018Learning Models with Uniform Performance via Distributionally Robust Optimizationcited by 335
  24. 2020Environment Inference for Invariant Learningcited by 306
  25. 2020The Risks of Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 262
  26. 2021Gradient Matching for Domain Generalizationcited by 258
  27. 2021Accuracy on the Line: On the Strong Correlation Between Out-of-Distribution and In-Distribution Generalizationcited by 249
  28. 2022Improving Out-of-Distribution Robustness via Selective Augmentationcited by 202
  29. 2020Invariant Risk Minimization Gamescited by 188
  30. 2021A Fine-Grained Analysis on Distribution Shiftcited by 171
  31. 2020BREEDS: Benchmarks for Subpopulation Shiftcited by 155
  32. 2019Distributionally Robust Language Modelingcited by 143
  33. 2021Model-Based Domain Generalizationcited by 104
  34. 2021Heterogeneous Risk Minimizationcited by 90
  35. 2020The iWildCam 2020 Competition Datasetcited by 86
  36. 2021Examining and Combating Spurious Features under Distribution Shiftcited by 65
  37. 2020Empirical or Invariant Risk Minimization? A Sample Complexity Perspectivecited by 62
  38. 2020An Empirical Study of Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 35

50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

11 papers.