Deep interpretable ensembles
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Ensembles improve prediction performance and allow uncertainty quantification by aggregating predictions from multiple models. In deep ensembling, the individual models are usually black box neural networks, or recently, partially interpretable semi-structured deep transformation models. However, interpretability of the ensemble members is generally lost upon aggregation. This is a crucial drawback of deep ensembles in high-stake decision fields, in which interpretable models are desired. We propose a novel transformation ensemble which aggregates probabilistic predictions with the guarantee to preserve interpretability and yield uniformly better predictions than the ensemble members on average. Transformation ensembles are tailored towards interpretable deep transformation models but are applicable to a wider range of probabilistic neural networks. In experiments on several publicly available data sets, we demonstrate that transformation ensembles perform on par with classical deep ensembles in terms of prediction performance, discrimination, and calibration. In addition, we demonstrate how transformation ensembles quantify both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty, and produce minimax optimal predictions under certain conditions.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2022.
Builds on
17 of 70 references.
References · 17
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,323
- 2015Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forestscited by 600
- 2020Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of Generalizationcited by 480
- 2019Deep Ensembles: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 443
- 2022Deep Ensembles Work, But Are They Necessary?cited by 63
- 2017The Relative Performance of Ensemble Methods with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Image Classificationcited by 50
- 2021Deep Ensembles from a Bayesian Perspectivecited by 27
- 2020Deep Conditional Transformation Modelscited by 23
- 2021CRPS Learningcited by 21
5 more
- 2015Most Likely Transformationscited by 20
- 2020Deep transformation models: Tackling complex regression problems with neural network based transformation modelscited by 18
- 2021Probabilistic Time Series Forecasts with Autoregressive Transformation Modelscited by 7
- 2021From Proper Scoring Rules to Max-Min Optimal Forecast Aggregationcited by 5
- 2022Confident Neural Network Regression with Bootstrapped Deep Ensemblescited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2022Bayesian posterior approximation with stochastic ensemblescited by 5
- 2024Bayesian Semi-structured Subspace Inferencecited by 3
- 2025Explainability in mulimodal deep transformation models for stroke outcome predictioncited by 0
- 2025Bridging Neural Networks and Dynamic Time Warping for Adaptive Time Series Classificationcited by 0
- 2026Conditional Rank-Rank Regression via Deep Conditional Transformation Modelscited by 0
- 2026Conditional Rank-Rank Regression via Deep Conditional Transformation Models7 Mar 2026
- 2025Bridging Neural Networks and Dynamic Time Warping for Adaptive Time Series Classification13 Jul 2025
- 2025Explainability in mulimodal deep transformation models for stroke outcome prediction7 Apr 2025
- 2024Bayesian Semi-structured Subspace Inference23 Jan 2024
- 2022Bayesian posterior approximation with stochastic ensembles15 Dec 2022