mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Probabilistic model-error assessment of deep learning proxies: an application to real-time inversion of borehole electromagnetic measurements

arXiv 2205.12684 ↗First posted 25 May 2022physics.geo-ph stat.AP stat.COcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The advent of fast sensing technologies allows for real-time model updates in many applications where the model parameters are uncertain. Bayesian algorithms, such as ensemble smoothers, offer a real-time probabilistic inversion accounting for uncertainties. However, they rely on the repeated evaluation of the computational models, and deep neural network (DNN) based proxies can be useful to address this computational bottleneck. This paper studies the effects of the approximate nature of the deep learned models and associated model errors during the inversion of extra-deep borehole electromagnetic (EM) measurements, which are critical for geosteering. Using a deep neural network (DNN) as a forward model allows us to perform thousands of model evaluations within seconds, which is very useful for quantifying uncertainties and non-uniqueness in real-time. While significant efforts are usually made to ensure the accuracy of the DNN models, it is known that they contain unknown model errors in the regions not covered by the training data. When DNNs are utilized during inversion of EM measurements, the effects of the model errors could manifest themselves as a bias in the estimated input parameters and, consequently, might result in a low-quality geosteering decision. We present numerical results highlighting the challenges associated with the inversion of EM measurements while neglecting model error. We further demonstrate the utility of a recently proposed flexible iterative ensemble smoother in reducing the effect of model bias by capturing the unknown model errors, thus improving the quality of the estimated subsurface properties for geosteering operation. Moreover, we describe a procedure for identifying inversion multimodality and propose possible solutions to alleviate it in real-time.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2022.

Builds on

6 of 25 references.

References · 6

  1. 2017DR-RNN: A deep residual recurrent neural network for model reductioncited by 20
  2. 2020Deep-Learning based Inverse Modeling Approaches: A Subsurface Flow Examplecited by 13
  3. 2018Reduced order modeling of subsurface multiphase flow models using deep residual recurrent neural networkscited by 9
  4. 2020Error Control and Loss Functions for the Deep Learning Inversion of Borehole Resistivity Measurementscited by 8
  5. 2018A Deep Learning Approach to the Inversion of Borehole Resistivity Measurementscited by 7
  6. 2020Modeling extra-deep electromagnetic logs using a deep neural networkcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.

3 papers.