mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep-Learning based Inverse Modeling Approaches: A Subsurface Flow Example

arXiv 2007.15580 ↗First posted 28 Jul 2020eess.SP cs.LG math.OCcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep-learning has achieved good performance and shown great potential for solving forward and inverse problems. In this work, two categories of innovative deep-learning based inverse modeling methods are proposed and compared. The first category is deep-learning surrogate-based inversion methods, in which the Theory-guided Neural Network (TgNN) is constructed as a deep-learning surrogate for problems with uncertain model parameters. By incorporating physical laws and other constraints, the TgNN surrogate can be constructed with limited simulation runs and accelerate the inversion process significantly. Three TgNN surrogate-based inversion methods are proposed, including the gradient method, the iterative ensemble smoother (IES), and the training method. The second category is direct-deep-learning-inversion methods, in which TgNN constrained with geostatistical information, named TgNN-geo, is proposed for direct inverse modeling. In TgNN-geo, two neural networks are introduced to approximate the respective random model parameters and the solution. Since the prior geostatistical information can be incorporated, the direct-inversion method based on TgNN-geo works well, even in cases with sparse spatial measurements or imprecise prior statistics. Although the proposed deep-learning based inverse modeling methods are general in nature, and thus applicable to a wide variety of problems, they are tested with several subsurface flow problems. It is found that satisfactory results are obtained with a high efficiency. Moreover, both the advantages and disadvantages are further analyzed for the proposed two categories of deep-learning based inversion methods.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Jul 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Partial Differential Equations Meet Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 25
  2. 2021Surrogate and inverse modeling for two-phase flow in porous media via theory-guided convolutional neural networkcited by 5
  3. 2023Transfer learning-based physics-informed convolutional neural network for simulating flow in porous media with time-varying controlscited by 4
  4. 2022Probabilistic model-error assessment of deep learning proxies: an application to real-time inversion of borehole electromagnetic measurementscited by 3
  5. 2024Deep Learning Framework for History Matching CO2 Storage with 4D Seismic and Monitoring Well Datacited by 3
  6. 2021Direct multi-modal inversion of geophysical logs using deep learningcited by 2
  7. 2025Towards Understanding the Benefits of Neural Network Parameterizations in Geophysical Inversions: A Study With Neural Fieldscited by 2
  8. 2021Deep-learning-based upscaling method for geologic models via theory-guided convolutional neural networkcited by 1
  9. 2026The FABRIC Strategy for Verifying Neural Feedback Systemscited by 1
  10. 2025WellPINN: Accurate Well Representation for Transient Fluid Pressure Diffusion in Subsurface Reservoirs with Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 0
  11. 2025Siamese Neural Network for Label-Efficient Critical Phenomena Prediction in 3D Percolation Modelscited by 0
  12. 2025Diffusion-Inversion-Net (DIN): An End-to-End Direct Probabilistic Framework for Characterizing Hydraulic Conductivities and Quantifying Uncertaintycited by 0
1 more
  1. 2026Physics-Encoded Inverse Modeling for Arctic Snow Depth Estimationcited by 0