mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Misleading Deep-Fake Detection with GAN Fingerprints

arXiv 2205.12543 ↗First posted 25 May 2022cs.CV cs.CR cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative adversarial networks (GANs) have made remarkable progress in synthesizing realistic-looking images that effectively outsmart even humans. Although several detection methods can recognize these deep fakes by checking for image artifacts from the generation process, multiple counterattacks have demonstrated their limitations. These attacks, however, still require certain conditions to hold, such as interacting with the detection method or adjusting the GAN directly. In this paper, we introduce a novel class of simple counterattacks that overcomes these limitations. In particular, we show that an adversary can remove indicative artifacts, the GAN fingerprint, directly from the frequency spectrum of a generated image. We explore different realizations of this removal, ranging from filtering high frequencies to more nuanced frequency-peak cleansing. We evaluate the performance of our attack with different detection methods, GAN architectures, and datasets. Our results show that an adversary can often remove GAN fingerprints and thus evade the detection of generated images.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2022.

Builds on

22 of 39 references.

References · 22

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,588
  3. 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,988
  4. 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,636
  5. 2015LSUN: Construction of a Large-scale Image Dataset using Deep Learning with Humans in the Loopcited by 1,355
  6. 2018Demystifying MMD GANscited by 1,293
  7. 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 847
  8. 2020Thinking in Frequency: Face Forgery Detection by Mining Frequency-aware Cluescited by 523
  9. 2020Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognitioncited by 504
  10. 2019Detecting and Simulating Artifacts in GAN Fake Imagescited by 293
  11. 2020Watch your Up-Convolution: CNN Based Generative Deep Neural Networks are Failing to Reproduce Spectral Distributionscited by 280
  12. 2020Media Forensics and DeepFakes: an overviewcited by 209
10 more
  1. 2018Do GANs leave artificial fingerprints?cited by 190
  2. 2017The Cramer Distance as a Solution to Biased Wasserstein Gradientscited by 119
  3. 2020Evading Deepfake-Image Detectors with White- and Black-Box Attackscited by 80
  4. 2019Unmasking DeepFakes with simple Featurescited by 78
  5. 2020Adversarial Threats to DeepFake Detection: A Practical Perspectivecited by 48
  6. 2019GANprintR: Improved Fakes and Evaluation of the State of the Art in Face Manipulation Detectioncited by 42
  7. 2020FakePolisher: Making DeepFakes More Detection-Evasive by Shallow Reconstructioncited by 33
  8. 2020Spectral Distribution Aware Image Generationcited by 29
  9. 2019SpoC: Spoofing Camera Fingerprintscited by 14
  10. 2020Preliminary Forensics Analysis of DeepFake Imagescited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

11 papers.