mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Toward Discovering Options that Achieve Faster Planning

arXiv 2205.12515 ↗First posted 25 May 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a new objective for option discovery that emphasizes the computational advantage of using options in planning. In a sequential machine, the speed of planning is proportional to the number of elementary operations used to achieve a good policy. For episodic tasks, the number of elementary operations depends on the number of options composed by the policy in an episode and the number of options being considered at each decision point. To reduce the amount of computation in planning, for a given set of episodic tasks and a given number of options, our objective prefers options with which it is possible to achieve a high return by composing few options, and also prefers a smaller set of options to choose from at each decision point. We develop an algorithm that optimizes the proposed objective. In a variant of the classic four-room domain, we show that 1) a higher objective value is typically associated with fewer number of elementary planning operations used by the option-value iteration algorithm to obtain a near-optimal value function, 2) our algorithm achieves an objective value that matches it achieved by two human-designed options 3) the amount of computation used by option-value iteration with options discovered by our algorithm matches it with the human-designed options, 4) the options produced by our algorithm also make intuitive sense--they seem to move to and terminate at the entrances of rooms.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2022.

Builds on

12 of 28 references.

References · 12

  1. 2018Diversity is All You Need: Learning Skills without a Reward Functioncited by 752
  2. 2018Data-Efficient Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 455
  3. 2016The Option-Critic Architecturecited by 448
  4. 2017FeUdal Networks for Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 337
  5. 2017A Laplacian Framework for Option Discovery in Reinforcement Learningcited by 110
  6. 2017Eigenoption Discovery through the Deep Successor Representationcited by 86
  7. 2017When Waiting is not an Option : Learning Options with a Deliberation Costcited by 58
  8. 2019Discovering Options for Exploration by Minimizing Cover Timecited by 31
  9. 2020Options of Interest: Temporal Abstraction with Interest Functionscited by 30
  10. 2021Discovery of Options via Meta-Learned Subgoalscited by 27
  11. 2019The Termination Criticcited by 24
  12. 2018Finding Options that Minimize Planning Timecited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2.

3 papers.