Please, Don't Forget the Difference and the Confidence Interval when Seeking for the State-of-the-Art Status
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper argues for the widest possible use of bootstrap confidence intervals for comparing NLP system performances instead of the state-of-the-art status (SOTA) and statistical significance testing. Their main benefits are to draw attention to the difference in performance between two systems and to help assessing the degree of superiority of one system over another. Two cases studies, one comparing several systems and the other based on a K-fold cross-validation procedure, illustrate these benefits. A python module for obtaining these confidence intervals as well as a second function implementing the Fisher-Pitman test for paired samples are freely available on PyPi.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2022.
Builds on
11 of 49 references.
References · 11
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2020XTREME: A Massively Multilingual Multi-task Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-lingual Generalizationcited by 738
- 2021Datasets: A Community Library for Natural Language Processingcited by 526
- 2017Are GANs Created Equal? A Large-Scale Studycited by 267
- 2019Show Your Work: Improved Reporting of Experimental Resultscited by 164
- 2021The Benchmark Lotterycited by 133
- 2015Effective LSTMs for Target-Dependent Sentiment Classificationcited by 82
- 2016Aspect Level Sentiment Classification with Deep Memory Networkcited by 82
- 2019Attentional Encoder Network for Targeted Sentiment Classificationcited by 48
- 2017WASSA-2017 Shared Task on Emotion Intensitycited by 37
- 2019Statistical Testing on ASR Performance via Blockwise Bootstrapcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.