Modernizing Open-Set Speech Language Identification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While most modern speech Language Identification methods are closed-set, we want to see if they can be modified and adapted for the open-set problem. When switching to the open-set problem, the solution gains the ability to reject an audio input when it fails to match any of our known language options. We tackle the open-set task by adapting two modern-day state-of-the-art approaches to closed-set language identification: the first using a CRNN with attention and the second using a TDNN. In addition to enhancing our input feature embeddings using MFCCs, log spectral features, and pitch, we will be attempting two approaches to out-of-set language detection: one using thresholds, and the other essentially performing a verification task. We will compare both the performance of the TDNN and the CRNN, as well as our detection approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2022.
Builds on
7 of 16 references.
References · 7
- 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,853
- 2018VoxCeleb2: Deep Speaker Recognitioncited by 862
- 2021MediaSpeech: Multilanguage ASR Benchmark and Datasetcited by 17
- 2017Language Identification Using Deep Convolutional Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 7
- 2021A reproduction of Apple's bi-directional LSTM models for language identification in short stringscited by 4
- 2018Pansori: ASR Corpus Generation from Open Online Video Contentscited by 3
- 2021Is Attention always needed? A Case Study on Language Identification from Speechcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.