mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Spiking Neural Operators for Scientific Machine Learning

arXiv 2205.10130 ↗First posted 17 May 2022cs.NE cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The main computational task of Scientific Machine Learning (SciML) is function regression, required both for inputs as well as outputs of a simulation. Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) and neural operators (such as DeepONet) have been very effective in solving Partial Differential Equations (PDEs), but they tax computational resources heavily and cannot be readily adopted for edge computing. Here, we address this issue by considering Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs), which have shown promise in reducing energy consumption by two orders of magnitude or more. We present a SNN-based method to perform regression, which has been a challenge due to the inherent difficulty in representing a function's input domain and continuous output values as spikes. We first propose a new method for encoding continuous values into spikes based on a triangular matrix in space and time, and demonstrate its better performance compared to the existing methods. Next, we demonstrate that using a simple SNN architecture consisting of Leaky Integrate and Fire (LIF) activation and two dense layers, we can achieve relatively accurate function regression results. Moreover, we can replace the LIF with a trained Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) network and obtain comparable results but three times faster. Then, we introduce the DeepONet, consisting of a branch (typically a Fully-connected Neural Network, FNN) for inputs and a trunk (also a FNN) for outputs. We can build a spiking DeepONet by either replacing the branch or the trunk by a SNN. We demonstrate this new approach for classification using the SNN in the branch, achieving results comparable to the literature. Finally, we design a spiking DeepONet for regression by replacing its trunk with a SNN, and achieve good accuracy for approximating functions as well as inferring solutions of differential equations.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2022.

Builds on

14 of 46 references.

References · 14

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  3. 2019Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 514
  4. 2021Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A reviewcited by 470
  5. 2018Deep Learning in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 258
  6. 2021Training Spiking Neural Networks Using Lessons From Deep Learningcited by 251
  7. 2018Going Deeper in Spiking Neural Networks: VGG and Residual Architecturescited by 236
  8. 2016Training Deep Spiking Neural Networks using Backpropagationcited by 203
  9. 2022Multifidelity deep neural operators for efficient learning of partial differential equations with application to fast inverse design of nanoscale heat transportcited by 92
  10. 2020Revisiting Batch Normalization for Training Low-latency Deep Spiking Neural Networks from Scratchcited by 76
  11. 2020Physics-informed neural network for ultrasound nondestructive quantification of surface breaking crackscited by 67
  12. 2020An Ensemble of Simple Convolutional Neural Network Models for MNIST Digit Recognitioncited by 30
2 more
  1. 2022Rate Coding or Direct Coding: Which One is Better for Accurate, Robust, and Energy-efficient Spiking Neural Networks?cited by 24
  2. 2018Neural-net-induced Gaussian process regression for function approximation and PDE solutioncited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

8 papers.