mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ExMo: Explainable AI Model using Inverse Frequency Decision Rules

arXiv 2205.10045 ↗First posted 20 May 2022cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we present a novel method to compute decision rules to build a more accurate interpretable machine learning model, denoted as ExMo. The ExMo interpretable machine learning model consists of a list of IF...THEN... statements with a decision rule in the condition. This way, ExMo naturally provides an explanation for a prediction using the decision rule that was triggered. ExMo uses a new approach to extract decision rules from the training data using term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) features. With TF-IDF, decision rules with feature values that are more relevant to each class are extracted. Hence, the decision rules obtained by ExMo can distinguish the positive and negative classes better than the decision rules used in the existing Bayesian Rule List (BRL) algorithm, obtained using the frequent pattern mining approach. The paper also shows that ExMo learns a qualitatively better model than BRL. Furthermore, ExMo demonstrates that the textual explanation can be provided in a human-friendly way so that the explanation can be easily understood by non-expert users. We validate ExMo on several datasets with different sizes to evaluate its efficacy. Experimental validation on a real-world fraud detection application shows that ExMo is 20% more accurate than BRL and that it achieves accuracy similar to those of deep learning models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2022.

Builds on

16 of 34 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  4. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  5. 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 440
  6. 2020GraphLIME: Local Interpretable Model Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 209
  7. 2015Interpretable classifiers using rules and Bayesian analysis: Building a better stroke prediction modelcited by 140
  8. 2016Scalable Bayesian Rule Listscited by 64
  9. 2019DLIME: A Deterministic Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations Approach for Computer-Aided Diagnosis Systemscited by 59
  10. 2014Falling Rule Listscited by 58
  11. 2020Causality-based Explanation of Classification Outcomescited by 25
  12. 2021An Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach for Unsupervised Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Rotating Machinerycited by 22
4 more
  1. 2018Instance-Level Explanations for Fraud Detection: A Case Studycited by 10
  2. 2021Explainable Machine Learning for Fraud Detectioncited by 9
  3. 2021Attack-agnostic Adversarial Detection on Medical Data Using Explainable Machine Learningcited by 7
  4. 2020Deep Learning Methods for Credit Card Fraud Detectioncited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.