mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Provably Precise, Succinct and Efficient Explanations for Decision Trees

arXiv 2205.09569 ↗First posted 19 May 2022cs.AI cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Decision trees (DTs) embody interpretable classifiers. DTs have been advocated for deployment in high-risk applications, but also for explaining other complex classifiers. Nevertheless, recent work has demonstrated that predictions in DTs ought to be explained with rigorous approaches. Although rigorous explanations can be computed in polynomial time for DTs, their size may be beyond the cognitive limits of human decision makers. This paper investigates the computation of δ-relevant sets for DTs. δ-relevant sets denote explanations that are succinct and provably precise. These sets represent generalizations of rigorous explanations, which are precise with probability one, and so they enable trading off explanation size for precision. The paper proposes two logic encodings for computing smallest δ-relevant sets for DTs. The paper further devises a polynomial-time algorithm for computing δ-relevant sets which are not guaranteed to be subset-minimal, but for which the experiments show to be most often subset-minimal in practice. The experimental results also demonstrate the practical efficiency of computing smallest δ-relevant sets.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2022.

Builds on

14 of 39 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
  4. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
  5. 2018Abduction-Based Explanations for Machine Learning Modelscited by 159
  6. 2018A Symbolic Approach to Explaining Bayesian Network Classifierscited by 130
  7. 2019Optimal Sparse Decision Treescited by 104
  8. 2020On The Reasons Behind Decisionscited by 99
  9. 2020Model Interpretability through the Lens of Computational Complexitycited by 75
  10. 2021On Explaining Random Forests with SATcited by 57
  11. 2021On Guaranteed Optimal Robust Explanations for NLP Modelscited by 54
  12. 2021On the Computational Intelligibility of Boolean Classifierscited by 40
2 more
  1. 2021Provably efficient, succinct, and precise explanationscited by 32
  2. 2021Probabilistic Sufficient Explanationscited by 24

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

8 papers.