Predicting Human Psychometric Properties Using Computational Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Transformer-based language models (LMs) continue to achieve state-of-the-art performance on natural language processing (NLP) benchmarks, including tasks designed to mimic human-inspired "commonsense" competencies. To better understand the degree to which LMs can be said to have certain linguistic reasoning skills, researchers are beginning to adapt the tools and concepts from psychometrics. But to what extent can benefits flow in the other direction? In other words, can LMs be of use in predicting the psychometric properties of test items, when those items are given to human participants? If so, the benefit for psychometric practitioners is enormous, as it can reduce the need for multiple rounds of empirical testing. We gather responses from numerous human participants and LMs (transformer- and non-transformer-based) on a broad diagnostic test of linguistic competencies. We then use the human responses to calculate standard psychometric properties of the items in the diagnostic test, using the human responses and the LM responses separately. We then determine how well these two sets of predictions correlate. We find that transformer-based LMs predict the human psychometric data consistently well across most categories, suggesting that they can be used to gather human-like psychometric data without the need for extensive human trials.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2022.
Builds on
27 of 62 references.
References · 27
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,413
- 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,811
- 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,790
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
- 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,847
- 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,729
15 more
- 2019SpanBERT: Improving Pre-training by Representing and Predicting Spanscited by 834
- 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 807
- 2013One Billion Word Benchmark for Measuring Progress in Statistical Language Modelingcited by 308
- 2019Assessing BERT's Syntactic Abilitiescited by 192
- 2020A Systematic Assessment of Syntactic Generalization in Neural Language Modelscited by 165
- 2020What Can We Learn from Collective Human Opinions on Natural Language Inference Data?cited by 153
- 2018Universal approximations of invariant maps by neural networkscited by 127
- 2020On the Predictive Power of Neural Language Models for Human Real-Time Comprehension Behaviorcited by 119
- 2019Evaluating Commonsense in Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 95
- 2020ConvBERT: Improving BERT with Span-based Dynamic Convolutioncited by 88
- 2021Comparing Test Sets with Item Response Theorycited by 57
- 2020Human Sentence Processing: Recurrence or Attention?cited by 51
- 2020Probabilistic Predictions of People Perusing: Evaluating Metrics of Language Model Performance for Psycholinguistic Modelingcited by 22
- 2020Dynamic Data Selection for Curriculum Learning via Ability Estimationcited by 21
- 2021Can Transformer Language Models Predict Psychometric Properties?cited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 3.
5 papers.
- 2022The Debate Over Understanding in AI's Large Language Modelscited by 142
- 2025Do LLMs Give Psychometrically Plausible Responses in Educational Assessments?cited by 14
- 2025Prompt Perturbations Reveal Human-Like Biases in Large Language Model Survey Responsescited by 13
- 2025Giving AI Personalities Leads to More Human-Like Reasoningcited by 3
- 2024The creative psychometric item generator: a framework for item generation and validation using large language modelscited by 2
- 2025Prompt Perturbations Reveal Human-Like Biases in Large Language Model Survey Responses9 Jul 2025
- 2025Do LLMs Give Psychometrically Plausible Responses in Educational Assessments?11 Jun 2025
- 2025Giving AI Personalities Leads to More Human-Like Reasoning19 Feb 2025
- 2024The creative psychometric item generator: a framework for item generation and validation using large language models30 Aug 2024
- 2022The Debate Over Understanding in AI's Large Language Models14 Oct 2022
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Psychometric Alignment: Capturing Human Knowledge Distributions via Language Models
- 2025Adding LLMs to the psycholinguistic norming toolbox: A practical guide to getting the most out of human ratings
- 2025Psycholinguistic Word Features: a New Approach for the Evaluation of LLMs Alignment with Humans
- 2025From Five Dimensions to Many: Large Language Models as Precise and Interpretable Psychological Profilers
- 2025Humanizing LLMs: A Survey of Psychological Measurements with Tools, Datasets, and Human-Agent Applications
- 2025AIPsychoBench: Understanding the Psychometric Differences between LLMs and Humans
- 2025Linguistic Interpretability of Transformer-based Language Models: a systematic review
- 2026AI Psychometrics: Evaluating the Psychological Reasoning of Large Language Models with Psychometric Validities