mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SubER: A Metric for Automatic Evaluation of Subtitle Quality

arXiv 2205.05805 ↗First posted 11 May 2022cs.CLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper addresses the problem of evaluating the quality of automatically generated subtitles, which includes not only the quality of the machine-transcribed or translated speech, but also the quality of line segmentation and subtitle timing. We propose SubER - a single novel metric based on edit distance with shifts that takes all of these subtitle properties into account. We compare it to existing metrics for evaluating transcription, translation, and subtitle quality. A careful human evaluation in a post-editing scenario shows that the new metric has a high correlation with the post-editing effort and direct human assessment scores, outperforming baseline metrics considering only the subtitle text, such as WER and BLEU, and existing methods to integrate segmentation and timing features.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2022.

Builds on

5 of 24 references.

References · 5

  1. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  2. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
  3. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
  4. 2020Is 42 the Answer to Everything in Subtitling-oriented Speech Translation?cited by 21
  5. 2020MuST-Cinema: a Speech-to-Subtitles corpuscited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

9 papers.