mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Characterizing the Action-Generalization Gap in Deep Q-Learning

arXiv 2205.05588 ↗First posted 11 May 2022cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the action generalization ability of deep Q-learning in discrete action spaces. Generalization is crucial for efficient reinforcement learning (RL) because it allows agents to use knowledge learned from past experiences on new tasks. But while function approximation provides deep RL agents with a natural way to generalize over state inputs, the same generalization mechanism does not apply to discrete action outputs. And yet, surprisingly, our experiments indicate that Deep Q-Networks (DQN), which use exactly this type of function approximator, are still able to achieve modest action generalization. Our main contribution is twofold: first, we propose a method of evaluating action generalization using expert knowledge of action similarity, and empirically confirm that action generalization leads to faster learning; second, we characterize the action-generalization gap (the difference in learning performance between DQN and the expert) in different domains. We find that DQN can indeed generalize over actions in several simple domains, but that its ability to do so decreases as the action space grows larger.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2022.

Builds on

4 of 8 references.

References · 4

  1. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,736
  2. 2017Revisiting the Arcade Learning Environment: Evaluation Protocols and Open Problems for General Agentscited by 269
  3. 2017Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 146
  4. 2022A Theory of Abstraction in Reinforcement Learningcited by 27

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.