mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Social Inclusion in Curated Contexts: Insights from Museum Practices

arXiv 2205.05192 ↗First posted 10 May 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial intelligence literature suggests that minority and fragile communities in society can be negatively impacted by machine learning algorithms due to inherent biases in the design process, which lead to socially exclusive decisions and policies. Faced with similar challenges in dealing with an increasingly diversified audience, the museum sector has seen changes in theory and practice, particularly in the areas of representation and meaning-making. While rarity and grandeur used to be at the centre stage of the early museum practices, folk life and museums' relationships with the diverse communities they serve become a widely integrated part of the contemporary practices. These changes address issues of diversity and accessibility in order to offer more socially inclusive services. Drawing on these changes and reflecting back on the AI world, we argue that the museum experience provides useful lessons for building AI with socially inclusive approaches, especially in situations in which both a collection and access to it will need to be curated or filtered, as frequently happens in search engines, recommender systems and digital libraries. We highlight three principles: (1) Instead of upholding the value of neutrality, practitioners are aware of the influences of their own backgrounds and those of others on their work. By not claiming to be neutral but practising cultural humility, the chances of addressing potential biases can be increased. (2) There should be room for situational interpretation beyond the stages of data collection and machine learning. Before applying models and predictions, the contexts in which relevant parties exist should be taken into account. (3) Community participation serves the needs of communities and has the added benefit of bringing practitioners and communities together.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 May 2022.

Builds on

10 of 50 references.

References · 10

  1. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
  2. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  3. 2020Large image datasets: A pyrrhic win for computer vision?cited by 237
  4. 2021The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Researchcited by 172
  5. 2017No Classification without Representation: Assessing Geodiversity Issues in Open Data Sets for the Developing Worldcited by 152
  6. 2020Towards Accountability for Machine Learning Datasets: Practices from Software Engineering and Infrastructurecited by 138
  7. 2019Lessons from Archives: Strategies for Collecting Sociocultural Data in Machine Learningcited by 116
  8. 2020Participation is not a Design Fix for Machine Learningcited by 110
  9. 2021Do Datasets Have Politics? Disciplinary Values in Computer Vision Dataset Developmentcited by 85
  10. 2021Empowering Local Communities Using Artificial Intelligencecited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

7 papers.