mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Practical Physics-Informed ML Design and Evaluation for Power Grid

arXiv 2205.03673 ↗First posted 7 May 2022cs.LG eess.SPcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When applied to a real-world safety critical system like the power grid, general machine learning methods suffer from expensive training, non-physical solutions, and limited interpretability. To address these challenges for power grids, many recent works have explored the inclusion of grid physics (i.e., domain expertise) into their method design, primarily through including system constraints and technical limits, reducing search space and defining meaningful features in latent space. Yet, there is no general methodology to evaluate the practicality of these approaches in power grid tasks, and limitations exist regarding scalability, generalization, interpretability, etc. This work formalizes a new concept of physical interpretability which assesses how a ML model makes predictions in a physically meaningful way and introduces an evaluation methodology that identifies a set of attributes that a practical method should satisfy. Inspired by the evaluation attributes, the paper further develops a novel contingency analysis warm starter for MadIoT cyberattack, based on a conditional Gaussian random field. This method serves as an instance of an ML model that can incorporate diverse domain knowledge and improve on these identified attributes. Experiments validate that the warm starter significantly boosts the efficiency of contingency analysis for MadIoT attack even with shallow NN architectures.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2022.

Builds on

17 of 39 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 702
  2. 2019Deep Lagrangian Networks: Using Physics as Model Prior for Deep Learningcited by 205
  3. 2021DC3: A learning method for optimization with hard constraintscited by 181
  4. 2017Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 146
  5. 2019Optimal Power Flow Using Graph Neural Networkscited by 60
  6. 2018Real-time Power System State Estimation and Forecasting via Deep Neural Networkscited by 32
  7. 2019DeepOPF: Deep Neural Network for DC Optimal Power Flowcited by 32
  8. 2020Physics-Guided Deep Neural Networks for Power Flow Analysiscited by 32
  9. 2019Fast Calculation of Probabilistic Power Flow: A Model-based Deep Learning Approachcited by 15
  10. 2019AI-Based Autonomous Line Flow Control via Topology Adjustment for Maximizing Time-Series ATCscited by 14
  11. 2022State Estimation in Electric Power Systems Leveraging Graph Neural Networkscited by 11
  12. 2020Dynamic Graph-Based Anomaly Detection in the Electrical Gridcited by 9
5 more
  1. 2016Real-Time Contingency Analysis with Corrective Transmission Switching - Part I: Methodologycited by 5
  2. 2020Learning-Based Real-Time Event Identification Using Rich Real PMU Datacited by 5
  3. 2018Robust Power Flow and Three-Phase Power Flow Analysescited by 3
  4. 2020Learning Latent Interactions for Event classification via Graph Neural Networks and PMU Datacited by 3
  5. 2022Circuit-theoretic Line Outage Distribution Factorcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.