Design Target Achievement Index: A Differentiable Metric to Enhance Deep Generative Models in Multi-Objective Inverse Design
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep Generative Machine Learning Models have been growing in popularity across the design community thanks to their ability to learn and mimic complex data distributions. While early works are promising, further advancement will depend on addressing several critical considerations such as design quality, feasibility, novelty, and targeted inverse design. We propose the Design Target Achievement Index (DTAI), a differentiable, tunable metric that scores a design's ability to achieve designer-specified minimum performance targets. We demonstrate that DTAI can drastically improve the performance of generated designs when directly used as a training loss in Deep Generative Models. We apply the DTAI loss to a Performance-Augmented Diverse GAN (PaDGAN) and demonstrate superior generative performance compared to a set of baseline Deep Generative Models including a Multi-Objective PaDGAN and specialized tabular generation algorithms like the Conditional Tabular GAN (CTGAN). We further enhance PaDGAN with an auxiliary feasibility classifier to encourage feasible designs. To evaluate methods, we propose a comprehensive set of evaluation metrics for generative methods that focus on feasibility, diversity, and satisfaction of design performance targets. Methods are tested on a challenging benchmarking problem: the FRAMED bicycle frame design dataset featuring mixed-datatype parametric data, heavily skewed and multimodal distributions, and ten competing performance objectives.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2022.
Builds on
8 of 30 references.
References · 8
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
- 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,580
- 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 695
- 2021Deep Generative Models in Engineering Design: A Reviewcited by 103
- 2021PcDGAN: A Continuous Conditional Diverse Generative Adversarial Network For Inverse Designcited by 30
- 2021BIKED: A Dataset for Computational Bicycle Design with Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 27
- 2020Integrating Deep Learning into CAD/CAE System: Generative Design and Evaluation of 3D Conceptual Wheelcited by 25
- 2020MO-PaDGAN: Reparameterizing Engineering Designs for Augmented Multi-objective Optimizationcited by 21
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
6 papers.
- 2023Beyond Statistical Similarity: Rethinking Metrics for Deep Generative Models in Engineering Designcited by 22
- 2023Constraining Generative Models for Engineering Design with Negative Datacited by 11
- 2023MCD: A Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Search Method For Multi-modal Design Modificationscited by 5
- 2025BikeBench: A Bicycle Design Benchmark for Generative Models with Objectives and Constraintscited by 5
- 2022Towards Goal, Feasibility, and Diversity-Oriented Deep Generative Models in Designcited by 3
- 2025DeepWheel: Generating a 3D Synthetic Wheel Dataset for Design and Performance Evaluationcited by 3
- 2025BikeBench: A Bicycle Design Benchmark for Generative Models with Objectives and Constraints25 May 2025
- 2025DeepWheel: Generating a 3D Synthetic Wheel Dataset for Design and Performance Evaluation15 Apr 2025
- 2023Constraining Generative Models for Engineering Design with Negative Data27 Jun 2023
- 2023MCD: A Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Search Method For Multi-modal Design Modifications18 May 2023
- 2023Beyond Statistical Similarity: Rethinking Metrics for Deep Generative Models in Engineering Design6 Feb 2023
- 2022Towards Goal, Feasibility, and Diversity-Oriented Deep Generative Models in Design14 Jun 2022