mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Masked Summarization to Generate Factually Inconsistent Summaries for Improved Factual Consistency Checking

arXiv 2205.02035 ↗First posted 4 May 2022cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite the recent advances in abstractive summarization systems, it is still difficult to determine whether a generated summary is factual consistent with the source text. To this end, the latest approach is to train a factual consistency classifier on factually consistent and inconsistent summaries. Luckily, the former is readily available as reference summaries in existing summarization datasets. However, generating the latter remains a challenge, as they need to be factually inconsistent, yet closely relevant to the source text to be effective. In this paper, we propose to generate factually inconsistent summaries using source texts and reference summaries with key information masked. Experiments on seven benchmark datasets demonstrate that factual consistency classifiers trained on summaries generated using our method generally outperform existing models and show a competitive correlation with human judgments. We also analyze the characteristics of the summaries generated using our method. We will release the pre-trained model and the code at https://github.com/hwanheelee1993/MFMA.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2022.

Builds on

25 of 33 references.

References · 25

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  4. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  5. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  6. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  7. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
  8. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,847
  9. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,317
  10. 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 900
  11. 2016Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyondcited by 812
  12. 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 807
13 more
  1. 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 674
  2. 2019Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 584
  3. 2020Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summariescited by 378
  4. 2021Understanding Factuality in Abstractive Summarization with FRANK: A Benchmark for Factuality Metricscited by 287
  5. 2016SummaRuNNer: A Recurrent Neural Network based Sequence Model for Extractive Summarization of Documentscited by 246
  6. 2021QuestEval: Summarization Asks for Fact-based Evaluationcited by 244
  7. 2017Faithful to the Original: Fact Aware Neural Abstractive Summarizationcited by 141
  8. 2021Annotating and Modeling Fine-grained Factuality in Summarizationcited by 131
  9. 2020Evaluating the Evaluation of Diversity in Natural Language Generationcited by 129
  10. 2018The Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER) Shared Taskcited by 108
  11. 2021DocNLI: A Large-scale Dataset for Document-level Natural Language Inferencecited by 75
  12. 2021Factual Consistency Evaluation for Text Summarization via Counterfactual Estimationcited by 37
  13. 2020Reducing Quantity Hallucinations in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.

5 papers.