mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Logiformer: A Two-Branch Graph Transformer Network for Interpretable Logical Reasoning

arXiv 2205.00731 ↗First posted 2 May 2022cs.CLcited by 8

On the map: LLM reasoning → Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine reading comprehension has aroused wide concerns, since it explores the potential of model for text understanding. To further equip the machine with the reasoning capability, the challenging task of logical reasoning is proposed. Previous works on logical reasoning have proposed some strategies to extract the logical units from different aspects. However, there still remains a challenge to model the long distance dependency among the logical units. Also, it is demanding to uncover the logical structures of the text and further fuse the discrete logic to the continuous text embedding. To tackle the above issues, we propose an end-to-end model Logiformer which utilizes a two-branch graph transformer network for logical reasoning of text. Firstly, we introduce different extraction strategies to split the text into two sets of logical units, and construct the logical graph and the syntax graph respectively. The logical graph models the causal relations for the logical branch while the syntax graph captures the co-occurrence relations for the syntax branch. Secondly, to model the long distance dependency, the node sequence from each graph is fed into the fully connected graph transformer structures. The two adjacent matrices are viewed as the attention biases for the graph transformer layers, which map the discrete logical structures to the continuous text embedding space. Thirdly, a dynamic gate mechanism and a question-aware self-attention module are introduced before the answer prediction to update the features. The reasoning process provides the interpretability by employing the logical units, which are consistent with human cognition. The experimental results show the superiority of our model, which outperforms the state-of-the-art single model on two logical reasoning benchmarks.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 31 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2022.

Builds on

31 of 42 references.

References · 31

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  4. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  5. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  6. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  7. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
  8. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,811
  9. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,164
  10. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,847
  11. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,554
  12. 2018Deeper Insights into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,102
19 more
  1. 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 861
  2. 2020A Generalization of Transformer Networks to Graphscited by 661
  3. 2021Do Transformers Really Perform Bad for Graph Representation?cited by 320
  4. 2016Bidirectional Attention Flow for Machine Comprehensioncited by 278
  5. 2020ReClor: A Reading Comprehension Dataset Requiring Logical Reasoningcited by 217
  6. 2020Retrieve, Program, Repeat: Complex Knowledge Base Question Answering via Alternate Meta-learningcited by 216
  7. 2020Graph-Bert: Only Attention is Needed for Learning Graph Representationscited by 177
  8. 2018QANet: Combining Local Convolution with Global Self-Attention for Reading Comprehensioncited by 164
  9. 2019Discourse-Aware Neural Extractive Text Summarizationcited by 105
  10. 2020Retrospective Reader for Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 86
  11. 2019Graph Transformer for Graph-to-Sequence Learningcited by 82
  12. 2019Recent Advances in Natural Language Inference: A Survey of Benchmarks, Resources, and Approachescited by 65
  13. 2019SG-Net: Syntax-Guided Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 52
  14. 2021Logic-Driven Context Extension and Data Augmentation for Logical Reasoning of Textcited by 46
  15. 2016Gated-Attention Readers for Text Comprehensioncited by 37
  16. 2020A Survey on Explainability in Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 33
  17. 2021DAGN: Discourse-Aware Graph Network for Logical Reasoningcited by 28
  18. 2020Simple and Effective Graph Autoencoders with One-Hop Linear Modelscited by 17
  19. 2019Machine Reading Comprehension: a Literature Reviewcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022AdaLoGN: Adaptive Logic Graph Network for Reasoning-Based Machine Reading Comprehension
  2. 2023Modeling Hierarchical Reasoning Chains by Linking Discourse Units and Key Phrases for Reading Comprehension
  3. 2022Discourse-Aware Graph Networks for Textual Logical Reasoning
  4. 2026SymbolLKG: Towards Verifiable Logical Reasoning via Logical Knowledge Graph and Symbolic Solvers
  5. 2023Integrating a Heterogeneous Graph with Entity-aware Self-attention using Relative Position Labels for Reading Comprehension Model
  6. 2023GraphReason: Enhancing Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models through A Graph-Based Verification Approach
  7. 2025Reasoning with Graphs: Structuring Implicit Knowledge to Enhance LLMs Reasoning
  8. 2023Query Structure Modeling for Inductive Logical Reasoning Over Knowledge Graphs