mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

KERMIT -- A Transformer-Based Approach for Knowledge Graph Matching

arXiv 2204.13931 ↗First posted 29 Apr 2022cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

One of the strongest signals for automated matching of knowledge graphs and ontologies are textual concept descriptions. With the rise of transformer-based language models, text comparison based on meaning (rather than lexical features) is available to researchers. However, performing pairwise comparisons of all textual descriptions of concepts in two knowledge graphs is expensive and scales quadratically (or even worse if concepts have more than one description). To overcome this problem, we follow a two-step approach: we first generate matching candidates using a pre-trained sentence transformer (so called bi-encoder). In a second step, we use fine-tuned transformer cross-encoders to generate the best candidates. We evaluate our approach on multiple datasets and show that it is feasible and produces competitive results.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2022.

Builds on

6 of 19 references.

References · 6

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  4. 2020Supervised Ontology and Instance Matching with MELTcited by 5
  5. 2020Visual Analysis of Ontology Matching Results with the MELT Dashboardcited by 3
  6. 2021Matching with Transformers in MELTcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.