mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the role of population heterogeneity in emergent communication

arXiv 2204.12982 ↗First posted 27 Apr 2022cs.MAcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Populations have often been perceived as a structuring component for language to emerge and evolve: the larger the population, the more structured the language. While this observation is widespread in the sociolinguistic literature, it has not been consistently reproduced in computer simulations with neural agents. In this paper, we thus aim to clarify this apparent contradiction. We explore emergent language properties by varying agent population size in the speaker-listener Lewis Game. After reproducing the experimental difference, we challenge the simulation assumption that the agent community is homogeneous. We first investigate how speaker-listener asymmetry alters language structure to examine two potential diversity factors: training speed and network capacity. We find out that emergent language properties are only altered by the relative difference of learning speeds between speaker and listener, and not by their absolute values. From then, we leverage this observation to control population heterogeneity without introducing confounding factors. We finally show that introducing such training speed heterogeneities naturally sort out the initial contradiction: larger simulated communities start developing more stable and structured languages.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 8; 2024: 6; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

24 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Emergent Communication: Generalization and Overfitting in Lewis Gamescited by 28
  2. 2024Iterated Learning Improves Compositionality in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 17
  3. 2024A Review of the Applications of Deep Learning-Based Emergent Communicationcited by 17
  4. 2023What makes a language easy to deep-learn? Deep neural networks and humans similarly benefit from compositional structurecited by 13
  5. 2023Towards More Human-like AI Communication: A Review of Emergent Communication Researchcited by 12
  6. 2023Lewis's Signaling Game as beta-VAE For Natural Word Lengths and Segmentscited by 11
  7. 2023Referential communication in heterogeneous communities of pre-trained visual deep networkscited by 10
  8. 2024Language Evolution with Deep Learningcited by 5
  9. 2022Over-communicate no more: Situated RL agents learn concise communication protocolscited by 4
  10. 2022Developing, Evaluating and Scaling Learning Agents in Multi-Agent Environmentscited by 2
  11. 2022Mathematically Modeling the Lexicon Entropy of Emergent Languagecited by 2
  12. 2023A framework for the emergence and analysis of language in social learning agentscited by 2
12 more
  1. 2023Emergent Communication with Attentioncited by 2
  2. 2024ELCC: the Emergent Language Corpus Collectioncited by 2
  3. 2025Implicit Repair with Reinforcement Learning in Emergent Communicationcited by 2
  4. 2023On the Correspondence between Compositionality and Imitation in Emergent Neural Communicationcited by 1
  5. 2024PACE: Procedural Abstractions for Communicating Efficientlycited by 1
  6. 2025From Grunts to Lexicons: Emergent Language from Cooperative Foragingcited by 1
  7. 2026Emergent Compositional Communication for Latent World Propertiescited by 1
  8. 2026Portable Semantics, Private Dialects: Reuse and Negative Transfer in Latent Communication Between Language-Model Cellscited by 1
  9. 2023Emergent Communication for Rules Reasoningcited by 0
  10. 2024Emergent Communication in Continuous Worlds: Self-Organisation of Conceptually Grounded Vocabularies at Scalecited by 0
  11. 2025VQEL: Enabling Self-Play in Emergent Language Games via Agent-Internal Vector Quantizationcited by 0
  12. 2026Emergent Communication between Heterogeneous Visual Agents through Decentralized Learningcited by 0