mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Visual Acuity Prediction on Real-Life Patient Data Using a Machine Learning Based Multistage System

arXiv 2204.11970 ↗First posted 25 Apr 2022eess.IV cs.CV cs.IRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In ophthalmology, intravitreal operative medication therapy (IVOM) is a widespread treatment for diseases related to the age-related macular degeneration (AMD), the diabetic macular edema (DME), as well as the retinal vein occlusion (RVO). However, in real-world settings, patients often suffer from loss of vision on time scales of years despite therapy, whereas the prediction of the visual acuity (VA) and the earliest possible detection of deterioration under real-life conditions is challenging due to heterogeneous and incomplete data. In this contribution, we present a workflow for the development of a research-compatible data corpus fusing different IT systems of the department of ophthalmology of a German maximum care hospital. The extensive data corpus allows predictive statements of the expected progression of a patient and his or her VA in each of the three diseases. For the disease AMD, we found out a significant deterioration of the visual acuity over time. Within our proposed multistage system, we subsequently classify the VA progression into the three groups of therapy "winners", "stabilizers", and "losers" (WSL classification scheme). Our OCT biomarker classification using an ensemble of deep neural networks results in a classification accuracy (F1-score) of over 98 %, enabling us to complete incomplete OCT documentations while allowing us to exploit them for a more precise VA modeling process. Our VA prediction requires at least four VA examinations and optionally OCT biomarkers from the same time period to predict the VA progression within a forecasted time frame, whereas our prediction is currently restricted to IVOM / no therapy. We achieve a final prediction accuracy of 69 % in macro average F1-score, while being in the same range as the ophthalmologists with 57.8 and 50 +- 10.7 % F1-score.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2022.

Builds on

10 of 52 references.

References · 10

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  4. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  5. 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,367
  6. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  7. 2016Grad-CAM: Why did you say that?cited by 161
  8. 2019Exploiting Epistemic Uncertainty of Anatomy Segmentation for Anomaly Detection in Retinal OCTcited by 42
  9. 2019Hexagonal Image Processing in the Context of Machine Learning: Conception of a Biologically Inspired Hexagonal Deep Learning Frameworkcited by 5
  10. 2018Fully Automated Segmentation of Hyperreflective Foci in Optical Coherence Tomography Imagescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.