Revisiting Gaussian mixture critics in off-policy reinforcement learning: a sample-based approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Actor-critic algorithms that make use of distributional policy evaluation have frequently been shown to outperform their non-distributional counterparts on many challenging control tasks. Examples of this behavior include the D4PG and DMPO algorithms as compared to DDPG and MPO, respectively [Barth-Maron et al., 2018; Hoffman et al., 2020]. However, both agents rely on the C51 critic for value estimation.One major drawback of the C51 approach is its requirement of prior knowledge about the minimum andmaximum values a policy can attain as well as the number of bins used, which fixes the resolution ofthe distributional estimate. While the DeepMind control suite of tasks utilizes standardized rewards and episode lengths, thus enabling the entire suite to be solved with a single setting of these hyperparameters, this is often not the case. This paper revisits a natural alternative that removes this requirement, namelya mixture of Gaussians, and a simple sample-based loss function to train it in an off-policy regime. We empirically evaluate its performance on a broad range of continuous control tasks and demonstrate that it eliminates the need for these distributional hyperparameters and achieves state-of-the-art performance on a variety of challenging tasks (e.g. the humanoid, dog, quadruped, and manipulator domains). Finallywe provide an implementation in the Acme agent repository.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2022.
Builds on
11 of 20 references.
References · 11
- 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 765
- 2017Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Quantile Regressioncited by 474
- 2018Implicit Quantile Networks for Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 369
- 2018Maximum a Posteriori Policy Optimisationcited by 328
- 2018Distributed Distributional Deterministic Policy Gradientscited by 199
- 2020Acme: A Research Framework for Distributed Reinforcement Learningcited by 146
- 2017The Cramer Distance as a Solution to Biased Wasserstein Gradientscited by 119
- 2016Learning values across many orders of magnitudecited by 85
- 2018An Analysis of Categorical Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 68
- 2018Relative Entropy Regularized Policy Iterationcited by 32
- 2021GMAC: A Distributional Perspective on Actor-Critic Frameworkcited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 4.
6 papers.
- 2024Generalizing Consistency Policy to Visual RL with Prioritized Proximal Experience Regularizationcited by 11
- 2024Near-Minimax-Optimal Distributional Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Modelcited by 7
- 2022SkillS: Adaptive Skill Sequencing for Efficient Temporally-Extended Explorationcited by 6
- 2024Neural Population Learning beyond Symmetric Zero-sum Gamescited by 4
- 2023Distillation Policy Optimizationcited by 1
- 2024Generalized Gaussian Temporal Difference Error for Uncertainty-aware Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2024Generalizing Consistency Policy to Visual RL with Prioritized Proximal Experience Regularization28 Sep 2024
- 2024Generalized Gaussian Temporal Difference Error for Uncertainty-aware Reinforcement Learning5 Aug 2024
- 2024Near-Minimax-Optimal Distributional Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model12 Feb 2024
- 2024Neural Population Learning beyond Symmetric Zero-sum Games10 Jan 2024
- 2023Distillation Policy Optimization1 Feb 2023
- 2022SkillS: Adaptive Skill Sequencing for Efficient Temporally-Extended Exploration24 Nov 2022