Cross-view Brain Decoding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
How the brain captures the meaning of linguistic stimuli across multiple views is still a critical open question in neuroscience. Consider three different views of the concept apartment: (1) picture (WP) presented with the target word label, (2) sentence (S) using the target word, and (3) word cloud (WC) containing the target word along with other semantically related words. Unlike previous efforts, which focus only on single view analysis, in this paper, we study the effectiveness of brain decoding in a zero-shot cross-view learning setup. Further, we propose brain decoding in the novel context of cross-view-translation tasks like image captioning (IC), image tagging (IT), keyword extraction (KE), and sentence formation (SF). Using extensive experiments, we demonstrate that cross-view zero-shot brain decoding is practical leading to ~0.68 average pairwise accuracy across view pairs. Also, the decoded representations are sufficiently detailed to enable high accuracy for cross-view-translation tasks with following pairwise accuracy: IC (78.0), IT (83.0), KE (83.7) and SF (74.5). Analysis of the contribution of different brain networks reveals exciting cognitive insights: (1) A high percentage of visual voxels are involved in image captioning and image tagging tasks, and a high percentage of language voxels are involved in the sentence formation and keyword extraction tasks. (2) Zero-shot accuracy of the model trained on S view and tested on WC view is better than same-view accuracy of the model trained and tested on WC view.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2022.
Builds on
12 of 43 references.
References · 12
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
- 2019Interpreting and improving natural-language processing (in machines) with natural language-processing (in the brain)cited by 128
- 2019From voxels to pixels and back: Self-supervision in natural-image reconstruction from fMRIcited by 67
- 2019Inducing brain-relevant bias in natural language processing modelscited by 38
- 2019Blackbox meets blackbox: Representational Similarity and Stability Analysis of Neural Language Models and Brainscited by 37
- 2019Linking artificial and human neural representations of languagecited by 37
- 2019CogniVal: A Framework for Cognitive Word Embedding Evaluationcited by 27
- 2020Brain2Word: Decoding Brain Activity for Language Generationcited by 15
- 2019Robust Evaluation of Language-Brain Encoding Experimentscited by 9
- 2018fMRI Semantic Category Decoding using Linguistic Encoding of Word Embeddingscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.