mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robustness Testing of Data and Knowledge Driven Anomaly Detection in Cyber-Physical Systems

arXiv 2204.09183 ↗First posted 20 Apr 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The growing complexity of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) and challenges in ensuring safety and security have led to the increasing use of deep learning methods for accurate and scalable anomaly detection. However, machine learning (ML) models often suffer from low performance in predicting unexpected data and are vulnerable to accidental or malicious perturbations. Although robustness testing of deep learning models has been extensively explored in applications such as image classification and speech recognition, less attention has been paid to ML-driven safety monitoring in CPS. This paper presents the preliminary results on evaluating the robustness of ML-based anomaly detection methods in safety-critical CPS against two types of accidental and malicious input perturbations, generated using a Gaussian-based noise model and the Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM). We test the hypothesis of whether integrating the domain knowledge (e.g., on unsafe system behavior) with the ML models can improve the robustness of anomaly detection without sacrificing accuracy and transparency. Experimental results with two case studies of Artificial Pancreas Systems (APS) for diabetes management show that ML-based safety monitors trained with domain knowledge can reduce on average up to 54.2% of robustness error and keep the average F1 scores high while improving transparency.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2022.

Builds on

23 of 50 references.

References · 23

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
  3. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  4. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
  5. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
  6. 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 484
  7. 2017A Semantic Loss Function for Deep Learning with Symbolic Knowledgecited by 267
  8. 2014Towards Deep Neural Network Architectures Robust to Adversarial Examplescited by 146
  9. 2020A Survey of Privacy Attacks in Machine Learningcited by 143
  10. 2021Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systemscited by 124
  11. 2015Learning to Diagnose with LSTM Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 99
  12. 2016Towards the Science of Security and Privacy in Machine Learningcited by 89
11 more
  1. 2020Deep Learning-Based Anomaly Detection in Cyber-Physical Systems: Progress and Opportunitiescited by 27
  2. 2020Adversarial Examples in Deep Learning for Multivariate Time Series Regressioncited by 26
  3. 2020ConAML: Constrained Adversarial Machine Learning for Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 13
  4. 2020Real-Time Context-aware Detection of Unsafe Events in Robot-Assisted Surgerycited by 11
  5. 2021Resilient Machine Learning for Networked Cyber Physical Systems: A Survey for Machine Learning Security to Securing Machine Learning for CPScited by 10
  6. 2018Cost-Sensitive Robustness against Adversarial Examplescited by 9
  7. 2020Crafting Adversarial Examples for Deep Learning Based Prognostics (Extended Version)cited by 9
  8. 2021Adversarial Attacks and Mitigation for Anomaly Detectors of Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 6
  9. 2021Data-driven Design of Context-aware Monitors for Hazard Prediction in Artificial Pancreas Systemscited by 5
  10. 2022Strategic Safety-Critical Attacks Against an Advanced Driver Assistance Systemcited by 4
  11. 2021Universal Adversarial Attack on Deep Learning Based Prognosticscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

5 papers.