mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Alternating Mahalanobis Distance Minimization for Stable and Accurate CP Decomposition

arXiv 2204.07208 ↗First posted 14 Apr 2022cs.LG cs.NA math.NAcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

CP decomposition (CPD) is prevalent in chemometrics, signal processing, data mining and many more fields. While many algorithms have been proposed to compute the CPD, alternating least squares (ALS) remains one of the most widely used algorithm for computing the decomposition. Recent works have introduced the notion of eigenvalues and singular values of a tensor and explored applications of eigenvectors and singular vectors in areas like signal processing, data analytics and in various other fields. We introduce a new formulation for deriving singular values and vectors of a tensor by considering the critical points of a function different from what is used in the previous work. Computing these critical points in an alternating manner motivates an alternating optimization algorithm which corresponds to alternating least squares algorithm in the matrix case. However, for tensors with order greater than equal to 3, it minimizes an objective function which is different from the commonly used least squares loss. Alternating optimization of this new objective leads to simple updates to the factor matrices with the same asymptotic computational cost as ALS. We show that a subsweep of this algorithm can achieve a superlinear convergence rate for exact CPD with known rank and verify it experimentally. We then view the algorithm as optimizing a Mahalanobis distance with respect to each factor with ground metric dependent on the other factors. This perspective allows us to generalize our approach to interpolate between updates corresponding to the ALS and the new algorithm to manage the tradeoff between stability and fitness of the decomposition. Our experimental results show that for approximating synthetic and real-world tensors, this algorithm and its variants converge to a better conditioned decomposition with comparable and sometimes better fitness as compared to the ALS algorithm.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2022.

Builds on

9 of 65 references.

References · 9

  1. 2016Tensor Decomposition for Signal Processing and Machine Learningcited by 223
  2. 2013A Survey on Metric Learning for Feature Vectors and Structured Datacited by 57
  3. 2020SWIFT: Scalable Wasserstein Factorization for Sparse Nonnegative Tensorscited by 6
  4. 2020Efficient parallel CP decomposition with pairwise perturbation and multi-sweep dimension treecited by 4
  5. 2018Parallel Nonnegative CP Decomposition of Dense Tensorscited by 3
  6. 2018Nesterov Acceleration of Alternating Least Squares for Canonical Tensor Decomposition: Momentum Step Size Selection and Restart Mechanismscited by 3
  7. 2017Globally convergent Jacobi-type algorithms for simultaneous orthogonal symmetric tensor diagonalizationcited by 1
  8. 2017Communication Lower Bounds for Matricized Tensor Times Khatri-Rao Productcited by 1
  9. 2019Approximate matrix and tensor diagonalization by unitary transformations: convergence of Jacobi-type algorithmscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.