mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AHP: Learning to Negative Sample for Hyperedge Prediction

arXiv 2204.06353 ↗First posted 13 Apr 2022cs.LG cs.SIcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Hypergraphs (i.e., sets of hyperedges) naturally represent group relations (e.g., researchers co-authoring a paper and ingredients used together in a recipe), each of which corresponds to a hyperedge (i.e., a subset of nodes). Predicting future or missing hyperedges bears significant implications for many applications (e.g., collaboration and recipe recommendation). What makes hyperedge prediction particularly challenging is the vast number of non-hyperedge subsets, which grows exponentially with the number of nodes. Since it is prohibitive to use all of them as negative examples for model training, it is inevitable to sample a very small portion of them, and to this end, heuristic sampling schemes have been employed. However, trained models suffer from poor generalization capability for examples of different natures. In this paper, we propose AHP, an adversarial training-based hyperedge-prediction method. It learns to sample negative examples without relying on any heuristic schemes. Using six real hypergraphs, we show that AHP generalizes better to negative examples of various natures. It yields up to 28.2% higher AUROC than the best existing methods and often even outperforms its variants with sampling schemes tailored to test sets.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2022.

Builds on

23 of 50 references.

References · 23

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2015Pointer Networkscited by 895
  3. 2018Hypergraph Neural Networkscited by 488
  4. 2017Towards Principled Methods for Training Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 464
  5. 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 219
  6. 2017Stabilizing Training of Generative Adversarial Networks through Regularizationcited by 118
  7. 2020HNHN: Hypergraph Networks with Hyperedge Neuronscited by 109
  8. 2018Simplicial Closure and higher-order link predictioncited by 93
  9. 2019Hyper-SAGNN: a self-attention based graph neural network for hypergraphscited by 69
  10. 2017Structural Deep Embedding for Hyper-Networkscited by 33
  11. 2021Double-Scale Self-Supervised Hypergraph Learning for Group Recommendationcited by 32
  12. 2019Clustering in graphs and hypergraphs with categorical edge labelscited by 31
11 more
  1. 2020How Much and When Do We Need Higher-order Information in Hypergraphs? A Case Study on Hyperedge Predictioncited by 31
  2. 2020Structural Patterns and Generative Models of Real-world Hypergraphscited by 29
  3. 2020The why, how, and when of representations for complex systemscited by 23
  4. 2021How Do Hyperedges Overlap in Real-World Hypergraphs? -- Patterns, Measures, and Generatorscited by 22
  5. 2021Hyperbolic Hypergraphs for Sequential Recommendationcited by 21
  6. 2020Hypergraph Motifs: Concepts, Algorithms, and Discoveriescited by 14
  7. 2020Evolution of Real-world Hypergraphs: Patterns and Models without Oraclescited by 14
  8. 2021Click-Through Rate Prediction with Multi-Modal Hypergraphscited by 12
  9. 2021Hypergraph Ego-networks and Their Temporal Evolutioncited by 6
  10. 2021THyMe+: Temporal Hypergraph Motifs and Fast Algorithms for Exact Countingcited by 4
  11. 2022On the Persistence of Higher-Order Interactions in Real-World Hypergraphscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 7.

12 papers.