mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Back to the Roots: Reconstructing Large and Complex Cranial Defects using an Image-based Statistical Shape Model

arXiv 2204.05703 ↗First posted 12 Apr 2022cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Designing implants for large and complex cranial defects is a challenging task, even for professional designers. Current efforts on automating the design process focused mainly on convolutional neural networks (CNN), which have produced state-of-the-art results on reconstructing synthetic defects. However, existing CNN-based methods have been difficult to translate to clinical practice in cranioplasty, as their performance on complex and irregular cranial defects remains unsatisfactory. In this paper, a statistical shape model (SSM) built directly on the segmentation masks of the skulls is presented. We evaluate the SSM on several cranial implant design tasks, and the results show that, while the SSM performs suboptimally on synthetic defects compared to CNN-based approaches, it is capable of reconstructing large and complex defects with only minor manual corrections. The quality of the resulting implants is examined and assured by experienced neurosurgeons. In contrast, CNN-based approaches, even with massive data augmentation, fail or produce less-than-satisfactory implants for these cases. Codes are publicly available at https://github.com/Jianningli/ssm

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2022.

Builds on

9 of 48 references.

References · 9

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,292
  3. 2018UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,525
  4. 2020Deep Learning -- A first Meta-Survey of selected Reviews across Scientific Disciplines, their Commonalities, Challenges and Research Impactcited by 11
  5. 2013GBM Volumetry using the 3D Slicer Medical Image Computing Platformcited by 10
  6. 2020A Baseline Approach for AutoImplant: the MICCAI 2020 Cranial Implant Design Challengecited by 10
  7. 2021Learning to Rearrange Voxels in Binary Segmentation Masks for Smooth Manifold Triangulationcited by 5
  8. 2019Smooth Extrapolation of Unknown Anatomy via Statistical Shape Modelscited by 3
  9. 2019Pelvis Surface Estimation From Partial CT for Computer-Aided Pelvic Osteotomiescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Improving Deep Learning-based Automatic Cranial Defect Reconstruction by Heavy Data Augmentation: From Image Registration to Latent Diffusion Models
  2. 2023Impact of Data Synthesis Strategies for the Classification of Craniosynostosis ↗
  3. 2023Mesh2SSM: From Surface Meshes to Statistical Shape Models of Anatomy
  4. 2024MASSM: An End-to-End Deep Learning Framework for Multi-Anatomy Statistical Shape Modeling Directly From Images
  5. 2026TRACE: Artifact-Robust Statistical Shape Modeling from Imperfect Surface Scans - A Case Study in Craniosynostosis 3D Photography
  6. 2023Point Cloud Diffusion Models for Automatic Implant Generation
  7. 2023Can point cloud networks learn statistical shape models of anatomies?
  8. 2023Progressive DeepSSM: Training Methodology for Image-To-Shape Deep Models