mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards efficient representation identification in supervised learning

arXiv 2204.04606 ↗First posted 10 Apr 2022cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Humans have a remarkable ability to disentangle complex sensory inputs (e.g., image, text) into simple factors of variation (e.g., shape, color) without much supervision. This ability has inspired many works that attempt to solve the following question: how do we invert the data generation process to extract those factors with minimal or no supervision? Several works in the literature on non-linear independent component analysis have established this negative result; without some knowledge of the data generation process or appropriate inductive biases, it is impossible to perform this inversion. In recent years, a lot of progress has been made on disentanglement under structural assumptions, e.g., when we have access to auxiliary information that makes the factors of variation conditionally independent. However, existing work requires a lot of auxiliary information, e.g., in supervised classification, it prescribes that the number of label classes should be at least equal to the total dimension of all factors of variation. In this work, we depart from these assumptions and ask: a) How can we get disentanglement when the auxiliary information does not provide conditional independence over the factors of variation? b) Can we reduce the amount of auxiliary information required for disentanglement? For a class of models where auxiliary information does not ensure conditional independence, we show theoretically and experimentally that disentanglement (to a large extent) is possible even when the auxiliary information dimension is much less than the dimension of the true latent representation.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2022.

Builds on

23 of 37 references.

References · 23

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  4. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
  5. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
  6. 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 929
  7. 2017A Survey on Multi-Task Learningcited by 838
  8. 2018Recognition in Terra Incognitacited by 655
  9. 2019Variational Autoencoders and Nonlinear ICA: A Unifying Frameworkcited by 494
  10. 2021Self-Supervised Learning with Data Augmentations Provably Isolates Content from Stylecited by 308
  11. 2018Nonlinear ICA Using Auxiliary Variables and Generalized Contrastive Learningcited by 278
  12. 2016Unsupervised Feature Extraction by Time-Contrastive Learning and Nonlinear ICAcited by 270
11 more
  1. 2019Causality for Machine Learningcited by 242
  2. 2020Weakly-Supervised Disentanglement Without Compromisescited by 237
  3. 2021Contrastive Learning Inverts the Data Generating Processcited by 220
  4. 2020Differentiable Causal Discovery from Interventional Datacited by 218
  5. 2021Towards Causal Representation Learningcited by 207
  6. 2019Learning Neural Causal Models from Unknown Interventionscited by 113
  7. 2020On Linear Identifiability of Learned Representationscited by 103
  8. 2020ICE-BeeM: Identifiable Conditional Energy-Based Deep Models Based on Nonlinear ICAcited by 102
  9. 2019Weakly Supervised Disentanglement with Guaranteescited by 82
  10. 2021Desiderata for Representation Learning: A Causal Perspectivecited by 76
  11. 2021Invariant Language Modelingcited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 6; 2024: 3; 2025: 2.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: