mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LaF: Labeling-Free Model Selection for Automated Deep Neural Network Reusing

arXiv 2204.03994 ↗First posted 8 Apr 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.SEcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Applying deep learning to science is a new trend in recent years which leads DL engineering to become an important problem. Although training data preparation, model architecture design, and model training are the normal processes to build DL models, all of them are complex and costly. Therefore, reusing the open-sourced pre-trained model is a practical way to bypass this hurdle for developers. Given a specific task, developers can collect massive pre-trained deep neural networks from public sources for re-using. However, testing the performance (e.g., accuracy and robustness) of multiple DNNs and recommending which model should be used is challenging regarding the scarcity of labeled data and the demand for domain expertise. In this paper, we propose a labeling-free (LaF) model selection approach to overcome the limitations of labeling efforts for automated model reusing. The main idea is to statistically learn a Bayesian model to infer the models' specialty only based on predicted labels. We evaluate LaF using 9 benchmark datasets including image, text, and source code, and 165 DNNs, considering both the accuracy and robustness of models. The experimental results demonstrate that LaF outperforms the baseline methods by up to 0.74 and 0.53 on Spearman's correlation and Kendall's τ, respectively.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2022.

Builds on

24 of 59 references.

References · 24

  1. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  2. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  3. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  4. 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 307
  5. 2019Devign: Effective Vulnerability Identification by Learning Comprehensive Program Semantics via Graph Neural Networkscited by 266
  6. 2017DeepTest: Automated Testing of Deep-Neural-Network-driven Autonomous Carscited by 249
  7. 2018code2vec: Learning Distributed Representations of Codecited by 249
  8. 2019Machine Learning Testing: Survey, Landscapes and Horizonscited by 213
  9. 2021CodeNet: A Large-Scale AI for Code Dataset for Learning a Diversity of Coding Taskscited by 199
  10. 2018DeepGauge: Multi-Granularity Testing Criteria for Deep Learning Systemscited by 144
  11. 2019MNIST-C: A Robustness Benchmark for Computer Visioncited by 137
  12. 2019Deep Learning vs. Traditional Computer Visioncited by 94
12 more
  1. 2020The iWildCam 2020 Competition Datasetcited by 86
  2. 2018TensorFuzz: Debugging Neural Networks with Coverage-Guided Fuzzingcited by 67
  3. 2018DLFuzz: Differential Fuzzing Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 64
  4. 2019Test Selection for Deep Learning Systemscited by 27
  5. 2019Boosting Operational DNN Testing Efficiency through Conditioningcited by 22
  6. 2021Distribution-Aware Testing of Neural Networks Using Generative Modelscited by 22
  7. 2021Automatic Web Testing using Curiosity-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 19
  8. 2021GUIGAN: Learning to Generate GUI Designs Using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 17
  9. 2021TestRank: Bringing Order into Unlabeled Test Instances for Deep Learning Taskscited by 7
  10. 2021Measuring Discrimination to Boost Comparative Testing for Multiple Deep Learning Modelscited by 6
  11. 2021Understanding and Testing Generalization of Deep Networks on Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 5
  12. 2021MUTEN: Boosting Gradient-Based Adversarial Attacks via Mutant-Based Ensemblescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.