Measuring Discrimination to Boost Comparative Testing for Multiple Deep Learning Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The boom of DL technology leads to massive DL models built and shared, which facilitates the acquisition and reuse of DL models. For a given task, we encounter multiple DL models available with the same functionality, which are considered as candidates to achieve this task. Testers are expected to compare multiple DL models and select the more suitable ones w.r.t. the whole testing context. Due to the limitation of labeling effort, testers aim to select an efficient subset of samples to make an as precise rank estimation as possible for these models. To tackle this problem, we propose Sample Discrimination based Selection (SDS) to select efficient samples that could discriminate multiple models, i.e., the prediction behaviors (right/wrong) of these samples would be helpful to indicate the trend of model performance. To evaluate SDS, we conduct an extensive empirical study with three widely-used image datasets and 80 real world DL models. The experimental results show that, compared with state-of-the-art baseline methods, SDS is an effective and efficient sample selection method to rank multiple DL models.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2021.
Builds on
13 of 39 references.
References · 13
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 307
- 2017DeepTest: Automated Testing of Deep-Neural-Network-driven Autonomous Carscited by 249
- 2018DeepGauge: Multi-Granularity Testing Criteria for Deep Learning Systemscited by 144
- 2018Guiding Deep Learning System Testing using Surprise Adequacycited by 123
- 2018DeepMutation: Mutation Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 66
- 2018DeepBillboard: Systematic Physical-World Testing of Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 50
- 2018Model-Reuse Attacks on Deep Learning Systemscited by 47
- 2019Automatic Testing and Improvement of Machine Translationcited by 35
- 2020Importance-Driven Deep Learning System Testingcited by 24
- 2019Boosting Operational DNN Testing Efficiency through Conditioningcited by 22
- 2017Scaling Deep Learning on GPU and Knights Landing clusterscited by 3
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 2.
6 papers.
- 2021NeuronFair: Interpretable White-Box Fairness Testing through Biased Neuron Identificationcited by 42
- 2022Unveiling Code Pre-Trained Models: Investigating Syntax and Semantics Capacitiescited by 9
- 2023Reusing Deep Neural Network Models through Model Re-engineeringcited by 5
- 2023Modularizing while Training: A New Paradigm for Modularizing DNN Modelscited by 3
- 2021Robust Active Learning: Sample-Efficient Training of Robust Deep Learning Modelscited by 2
- 2022LaF: Labeling-Free Model Selection for Automated Deep Neural Network Reusingcited by 1
- 2023Modularizing while Training: A New Paradigm for Modularizing DNN Models15 Jun 2023
- 2023Reusing Deep Neural Network Models through Model Re-engineering1 Apr 2023
- 2022Unveiling Code Pre-Trained Models: Investigating Syntax and Semantics Capacities20 Dec 2022
- 2022LaF: Labeling-Free Model Selection for Automated Deep Neural Network Reusing8 Apr 2022
- 2021NeuronFair: Interpretable White-Box Fairness Testing through Biased Neuron Identification25 Dec 2021
- 2021Robust Active Learning: Sample-Efficient Training of Robust Deep Learning Models5 Dec 2021