mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Match-Prompt: Improving Multi-task Generalization Ability for Neural Text Matching via Prompt Learning

arXiv 2204.02725 ↗First posted 6 Apr 2022cs.IR cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Text matching is a fundamental technique in both information retrieval and natural language processing. Text matching tasks share the same paradigm that determines the relationship between two given texts. The relationships vary from task to task, e.g.~relevance in document retrieval, semantic alignment in paraphrase identification and answerable judgment in question answering. However, the essential signals for text matching remain in a finite scope, i.e.~exact matching, semantic matching, and inference matching. Ideally, a good text matching model can learn to capture and aggregate these signals for different matching tasks to achieve competitive performance, while recent state-of-the-art text matching models, e.g.~Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs), are hard to generalize. It is because the end-to-end supervised learning on task-specific dataset makes model overemphasize the data sample bias and task-specific signals instead of the essential matching signals. To overcome this problem, we adopt a specialization-generalization training strategy and refer to it as Match-Prompt. In specialization stage, descriptions of different matching tasks are mapped to a few prompt tokens. In generalization stage, matching model explores the essential matching signals by being trained on diverse matching tasks. High diverse matching tasks avoid model fitting the data bias on a specific task, so that model can focus on learning the essential matching signals. Meanwhile, the prompt tokens obtained in the first step help the model distinguish different task-specific matching signals. Experimental results on public datasets show that Match-Prompt can improve multi-task generalization capability of PLMs in text matching and yield better in-domain multi-task, out-of-domain multi-task and new task adaptation performance than multi-task and task-specific models trained by previous fine-tuning paradigm.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 50 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2022.

Builds on

50 of 73 references.

References · 50

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  5. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  6. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  7. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
  8. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  9. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
  10. 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
  11. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
  12. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
38 more
  1. 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 953
  2. 2020Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inferencecited by 934
  3. 2017Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questionscited by 777
  4. 2021GPT Understands, Toocited by 715
  5. 2019Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 691
  6. 2017DailyDialog: A Manually Labelled Multi-turn Dialogue Datasetcited by 649
  7. 2020KILT: a Benchmark for Knowledge Intensive Language Taskscited by 571
  8. 2020UnifiedQA: Crossing Format Boundaries With a Single QA Systemcited by 475
  9. 2019Multi-Task Deep Neural Networks for Natural Language Understandingcited by 349
  10. 2020AutoPrompt: Eliciting Knowledge from Language Models with Automatically Generated Promptscited by 246
  11. 2018The Natural Language Decathlon: Multitask Learning as Question Answeringcited by 235
  12. 2021SPoT: Better Frozen Model Adaptation through Soft Prompt Transfercited by 235
  13. 2021PPT: Pre-trained Prompt Tuning for Few-shot Learningcited by 232
  14. 2016Enhanced LSTM for Natural Language Inferencecited by 199
  15. 2019A Unified MRC Framework for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 199
  16. 2021ExT5: Towards Extreme Multi-Task Scaling for Transfer Learningcited by 161
  17. 2017A Deep Relevance Matching Model for Ad-hoc Retrievalcited by 126
  18. 2020Few-Shot Text Generation with Pattern-Exploiting Trainingcited by 87
  19. 2015Convolutional Neural Network Architectures for Matching Natural Language Sentencescited by 82
  20. 2019CEDR: Contextualized Embeddings for Document Rankingcited by 77
  21. 2017A Continuously Growing Dataset of Sentential Paraphrasescited by 72
  22. 2016Learning to Match Using Local and Distributed Representations of Text for Web Searchcited by 68
  23. 2019MultiQA: An Empirical Investigation of Generalization and Transfer in Reading Comprehensioncited by 60
  24. 2016Text Matching as Image Recognitioncited by 59
  25. 2019Zero-shot Text Classification With Generative Language Modelscited by 55
  26. 2022ZeroPrompt: Scaling Prompt-Based Pretraining to 1,000 Tasks Improves Zero-Shot Generalizationcited by 54
  27. 2021Multi-task Retrieval for Knowledge-Intensive Taskscited by 44
  28. 2019AmazonQA: A Review-Based Question Answering Taskcited by 43
  29. 2020PROP: Pre-training with Representative Words Prediction for Ad-hoc Retrievalcited by 40
  30. 2019Simple and Effective Text Matching with Richer Alignment Featurescited by 29
  31. 2021Adaptive Information Seeking for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 29
  32. 2016Match-SRNN: Modeling the Recursive Matching Structure with Spatial RNNcited by 27
  33. 2020Description Based Text Classification with Reinforcement Learningcited by 27
  34. 2021Using Prior Knowledge to Guide BERT's Attention in Semantic Textual Matching Taskscited by 22
  35. 2017DeepRank: A New Deep Architecture for Relevance Ranking in Information Retrievalcited by 21
  36. 2020PARADE: A New Dataset for Paraphrase Identification Requiring Computer Science Domain Knowledgecited by 7
  37. 2021A Linguistic Study on Relevance Modeling in Information Retrievalcited by 6
  38. 2021Match-Ignition: Plugging PageRank into Transformer for Long-form Text Matchingcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 7; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

10 papers.