mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Lost in Latent Space: Disentangled Models and the Challenge of Combinatorial Generalisation

arXiv 2204.02283 ↗First posted 5 Apr 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent research has shown that generative models with highly disentangled representations fail to generalise to unseen combination of generative factor values. These findings contradict earlier research which showed improved performance in out-of-training distribution settings when compared to entangled representations. Additionally, it is not clear if the reported failures are due to (a) encoders failing to map novel combinations to the proper regions of the latent space or (b) novel combinations being mapped correctly but the decoder/downstream process is unable to render the correct output for the unseen combinations. We investigate these alternatives by testing several models on a range of datasets and training settings. We find that (i) when models fail, their encoders also fail to map unseen combinations to correct regions of the latent space and (ii) when models succeed, it is either because the test conditions do not exclude enough examples, or because excluded generative factors determine independent parts of the output image. Based on these results, we argue that to generalise properly, models not only need to capture factors of variation, but also understand how to invert the generative process that was used to generate the data.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2022.

Builds on

18 of 47 references.

References · 18

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 4,053
  4. 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,360
  5. 2018Disentangling by Factorisingcited by 616
  6. 2017Wasserstein Auto-Encoderscited by 373
  7. 2018Towards a Definition of Disentangled Representationscited by 296
  8. 2016Unsupervised Feature Extraction by Time-Contrastive Learning and Nonlinear ICAcited by 273
  9. 2020Weakly-Supervised Disentanglement Without Compromisescited by 239
  10. 2017DARLA: Improving Zero-Shot Transfer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 149
  11. 2020Towards Nonlinear Disentanglement in Natural Data with Temporal Sparse Codingcited by 122
  12. 2019Spatial Broadcast Decoder: A Simple Architecture for Learning Disentangled Representations in VAEscited by 117
6 more
  1. 2019Are Disentangled Representations Helpful for Abstract Visual Reasoning?cited by 100
  2. 2019On the Transfer of Inductive Bias from Simulation to the Real World: a New Disentanglement Datasetcited by 100
  3. 2021Visual Representation Learning Does Not Generalize Strongly Within the Same Domaincited by 61
  4. 2019Unsupervised Model Selection for Variational Disentangled Representation Learningcited by 46
  5. 2021Commutative Lie Group VAE for Disentanglement Learningcited by 27
  6. 2019Learning Discrete and Continuous Factors of Data via Alternating Disentanglementcited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 6; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

11 papers.