mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Vision Transformer with Cross-attention by Temporal Shift for Efficient Action Recognition

arXiv 2204.00452 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2022cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Feature shifts have been shown to be useful for action recognition with CNN-based models since Temporal Shift Module (TSM) was proposed. It is based on frame-wise feature extraction with late fusion, and layer features are shifted along the time direction for the temporal interaction. TokenShift, a recent model based on Vision Transformer (ViT), also uses the temporal feature shift mechanism, which, however, does not fully exploit the structure of Multi-head Self-Attention (MSA) in ViT. In this paper, we propose Multi-head Self/Cross-Attention (MSCA), which fully utilizes the attention structure. TokenShift is based on a frame-wise ViT with features temporally shifted with successive frames (at time t+1 and t-1). In contrast, the proposed MSCA replaces MSA in the frame-wise ViT, and some MSA heads attend to successive frames instead of the current frame. The computation cost is the same as the frame-wise ViT and TokenShift as it simply changes the target to which the attention is taken. There is a choice about which of key, query, and value are taken from the successive frames, then we experimentally compared these variants with Kinetics400. We also investigate other variants in which the proposed MSCA is used along the patch dimension of ViT, instead of the head dimension. Experimental results show that a variant, MSCA-KV, shows the best performance and is better than TokenShift by 0.1% and then ViT by 1.2%.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2022.

Builds on

24 of 31 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,276
  5. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,259
  6. 2017Non-local Neural Networkscited by 2,290
  7. 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,894
  8. 2021ViViT: A Video Vision Transformercited by 1,610
  9. 2021Is Space-Time Attention All You Need for Video Understanding?cited by 1,609
  10. 2017A Closer Look at Spatiotemporal Convolutions for Action Recognitioncited by 1,139
  11. 2014Two-Stream Convolutional Networks for Action Recognition in Videoscited by 1,067
  12. 2018TSM: Temporal Shift Module for Efficient Video Understandingcited by 852
12 more
  1. 2017Can Spatiotemporal 3D CNNs Retrace the History of 2D CNNs and ImageNet?cited by 551
  2. 2014Long-term Recurrent Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition and Descriptioncited by 483
  3. 2017Learning Spatio-Temporal Representation with Pseudo-3D Residual Networkscited by 386
  4. 2018Video Action Transformer Networkcited by 316
  5. 2021VidTr: Video Transformer Without Convolutionscited by 112
  6. 2017Shift: A Zero FLOP, Zero Parameter Alternative to Spatial Convolutionscited by 93
  7. 2021An Image is Worth 16x16 Words, What is a Video Worth?cited by 87
  8. 2021Space-time Mixing Attention for Video Transformercited by 84
  9. 2019Gate-Shift Networks for Video Action Recognitioncited by 76
  10. 2021Token Shift Transformer for Video Classificationcited by 61
  11. 2019All You Need is a Few Shifts: Designing Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Image Classificationcited by 38
  12. 2018S3D: Single Shot multi-Span Detector via Fully 3D Convolutional Networkscited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 2.

5 papers.