mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Efficient Dropout-resilient Aggregation for Privacy-preserving Machine Learning

arXiv 2203.17044 ↗First posted 31 Mar 2022cs.CRcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the increasing adoption of data-hungry machine learning algorithms, personal data privacy has emerged as one of the key concerns that could hinder the success of digital transformation. As such, Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning (PPML) has received much attention from both academia and industry. However, organizations are faced with the dilemma that, on the one hand, they are encouraged to share data to enhance ML performance, but on the other hand, they could potentially be breaching the relevant data privacy regulations. Practical PPML typically allows multiple participants to individually train their ML models, which are then aggregated to construct a global model in a privacy-preserving manner, e.g., based on multi-party computation or homomorphic encryption. Nevertheless, in most important applications of large-scale PPML, e.g., by aggregating clients' gradients to update a global model for federated learning, such as consumer behavior modeling of mobile application services, some participants are inevitably resource-constrained mobile devices, which may drop out of the PPML system due to their mobility nature. Therefore, the resilience of privacy-preserving aggregation has become an important problem to be tackled. In this paper, we propose a scalable privacy-preserving aggregation scheme that can tolerate dropout by participants at any time, and is secure against both semi-honest and active malicious adversaries by setting proper system parameters. By replacing communication-intensive building blocks with a seed homomorphic pseudo-random generator, and relying on the additive homomorphic property of Shamir secret sharing scheme, our scheme outperforms state-of-the-art schemes by up to 6.37× in runtime and provides a stronger dropout-resilience. The simplicity of our scheme makes it attractive both for implementation and for further improvements.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 7; 2024: 7; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Threats, Attacks, and Defenses in Machine Unlearning: A Surveycited by 34
  2. 2023Model Extraction Attacks Revisitedcited by 21
  3. 2023FedVS: Straggler-Resilient and Privacy-Preserving Vertical Federated Learning for Split Modelscited by 17
  4. 2023MimiC: Combating Client Dropouts in Federated Learning by Mimicking Central Updatescited by 10
  5. 2024Towards Efficient and Certified Recovery from Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learningcited by 7
  6. 2025Fundamental Limits of Hierarchical Secure Aggregation with Cyclic User Associationcited by 7
  7. 2024Device Scheduling and Assignment in Hierarchical Federated Learning for Internet of Thingscited by 6
  8. 2024A Survey of Privacy-Preserving Model Explanations: Privacy Risks, Attacks, and Countermeasurescited by 6
  9. 2025TAPFed: Threshold Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 4
  10. 2024FedUHB: Accelerating Federated Unlearning via Polyak Heavy Ball Methodcited by 3
  11. 2023Recoverable Privacy-Preserving Image Classification through Noise-like Adversarial Examplescited by 2
  12. 2024Efficient Federated Unlearning with Adaptive Differential Privacy Preservationcited by 2
6 more
  1. 2025Information-Theoretic Decentralized Secure Aggregation with Passive Collusion Resiliencecited by 2
  2. 2023Human-imperceptible, Machine-recognizable Imagescited by 1
  3. 2023User Assignment and Resource Allocation for Hierarchical Federated Learning over Wireless Networkscited by 1
  4. 2023MAF-Net: Multiple attention-guided fusion network for fundus vascular image segmentationcited by 0
  5. 2024Privacy-Preserving Orthogonal Aggregation for Guaranteeing Gender Fairness in Federated Recommendationcited by 0
  6. 2026The Capacity of Information-Theoretic Secure Aggregation in Federated Learningcited by 0