Is Word Error Rate a good evaluation metric for Speech Recognition in Indic Languages?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose a new method for the calculation of error rates in Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR). This new metric is for languages that contain half characters and where the same character can be written in different forms. We implement our methodology in Hindi which is one of the main languages from Indic context and we think this approach is scalable to other similar languages containing a large character set. We call our metrics Alternate Word Error Rate (AWER) and Alternate Character Error Rate (ACER). We train our ASR models using wav2vec 2.0citebaevski2020wav2vec for Indic languages. Additionally we use language models to improve our model performance. Our results show a significant improvement in analyzing the error rates at word and character level and the interpretability of the ASR system is improved upto 3% in AWER and 7% in ACER for Hindi. Our experiments suggest that in languages which have complex pronunciation, there are multiple ways of writing words without changing their meaning. In such cases AWER and ACER will be more useful rather than WER and CER as metrics. Further, we open source a new benchmarking dataset of 21 hours for Hindi with the new metric scripts.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2022.
Builds on
4 of 15 references.
References · 4
- 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,853
- 2014Deep Speech: Scaling up end-to-end speech recognitioncited by 354
- 2020Rethinking Evaluation in ASR: Are Our Models Robust Enough?cited by 72
- 2021CLSRIL-23: Cross Lingual Speech Representations for Indic Languagescited by 22
Built on by
Not cited yet.