mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Visualizing the Relationship Between Encoded Linguistic Information and Task Performance

arXiv 2203.15860 ↗First posted 29 Mar 2022cs.CL cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Probing is popular to analyze whether linguistic information can be captured by a well-trained deep neural model, but it is hard to answer how the change of the encoded linguistic information will affect task performance. To this end, we study the dynamic relationship between the encoded linguistic information and task performance from the viewpoint of Pareto Optimality. Its key idea is to obtain a set of models which are Pareto-optimal in terms of both objectives. From this viewpoint, we propose a method to optimize the Pareto-optimal models by formalizing it as a multi-objective optimization problem. We conduct experiments on two popular NLP tasks, i.e., machine translation and language modeling, and investigate the relationship between several kinds of linguistic information and task performances. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method is better than a baseline method. Our empirical findings suggest that some syntactic information is helpful for NLP tasks whereas encoding more syntactic information does not necessarily lead to better performance, because the model architecture is also an important factor.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Mar 2022.

Builds on

37 of 51 references.

References · 37

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
  4. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  5. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  6. 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,906
  7. 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,486
  8. 2017Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptationcited by 1,309
  9. 2015Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,024
  10. 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 719
  11. 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 608
  12. 2019LayoutLM: Pre-training of Text and Layout for Document Image Understandingcited by 549
25 more
  1. 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 452
  2. 2020Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projectioncited by 442
  3. 2020Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description Lengthcited by 230
  4. 2016Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Taskscited by 216
  5. 2017Regularizing and Optimizing LSTM Language Modelscited by 205
  6. 2020Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structurecited by 204
  7. 2014Recurrent Neural Network Regularizationcited by 189
  8. 2018Adversarial Removal of Demographic Attributes from Text Datacited by 166
  9. 2020Minimax Pareto Fairness: A Multi Objective Perspectivecited by 152
  10. 2020Probing the Probing Paradigm: Does Probing Accuracy Entail Task Relevance?cited by 144
  11. 2017Controllable Invariance through Adversarial Feature Learningcited by 127
  12. 2018The Best of Both Worlds: Combining Recent Advances in Neural Machine Translationcited by 101
  13. 2015Multi-task Sequence to Sequence Learningcited by 94
  14. 2017Graph Convolutional Encoders for Syntax-aware Neural Machine Translationcited by 70
  15. 2021Low-Complexity Probing via Finding Subnetworkscited by 63
  16. 2020Pareto Probing: Trading Off Accuracy for Complexitycited by 55
  17. 2016Linguistic Input Features Improve Neural Machine Translationcited by 38
  18. 2020Probing Linguistic Features of Sentence-Level Representations in Neural Relation Extractioncited by 18
  19. 2017Learning to Parse and Translate Improves Neural Machine Translationcited by 16
  20. 2017Predicting Target Language CCG Supertags Improves Neural Machine Translationcited by 15
  21. 2020Evaluating Explanation Methods for Neural Machine Translationcited by 14
  22. 2020Amnesic Probing: Behavioral Explanation with Amnesic Counterfactualscited by 12
  23. 2020Probing Neural Dialog Models for Conversational Understandingcited by 10
  24. 2017Neural Machine Translation with Source-Side Latent Graph Parsingcited by 3
  25. 2020On the Discrepancy between Density Estimation and Sequence Generationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.