mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Probing Linguistic Features of Sentence-Level Representations in Neural Relation Extraction

arXiv 2004.08134 ↗First posted 17 Apr 2020cs.CLcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite the recent progress, little is known about the features captured by state-of-the-art neural relation extraction (RE) models. Common methods encode the source sentence, conditioned on the entity mentions, before classifying the relation. However, the complexity of the task makes it difficult to understand how encoder architecture and supporting linguistic knowledge affect the features learned by the encoder. We introduce 14 probing tasks targeting linguistic properties relevant to RE, and we use them to study representations learned by more than 40 different encoder architecture and linguistic feature combinations trained on two datasets, TACRED and SemEval 2010 Task 8. We find that the bias induced by the architecture and the inclusion of linguistic features are clearly expressed in the probing task performance. For example, adding contextualized word representations greatly increases performance on probing tasks with a focus on named entity and part-of-speech information, and yields better results in RE. In contrast, entity masking improves RE, but considerably lowers performance on entity type related probing tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 6; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Why is Winoground Hard? Investigating Failures in Visuolinguistic Compositionalitycited by 44
  2. 2021BenchIE: A Framework for Multi-Faceted Fact-Based Open Information Extraction Evaluationcited by 11
  3. 2022HiCLRE: A Hierarchical Contrastive Learning Framework for Distantly Supervised Relation Extractioncited by 8
  4. 2022Confidence estimation of classification based on the distribution of the neural network output layercited by 7
  5. 2021RuSentEval: Linguistic Source, Encoder Force!cited by 4
  6. 2021What can Neural Referential Form Selectors Learn?cited by 4
  7. 2022Getting BART to Ride the Idiomatic Train: Learning to Represent Idiomatic Expressionscited by 4
  8. 2022Do Charge Prediction Models Learn Legal Theory?cited by 3
  9. 2021Making Document-Level Information Extraction Right for the Right Reasonscited by 2
  10. 2022Visualizing the Relationship Between Encoded Linguistic Information and Task Performancecited by 1
  11. 2023Probing Representations for Document-level Event Extractioncited by 1
  12. 2026The Grammar of Transformers: A Systematic Review of Interpretability Research on Syntactic Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 1
6 more
  1. 2021Improving Span Representation for Domain-adapted Coreference Resolutioncited by 0
  2. 2021From Consensus to Disagreement: Multi-Teacher Distillation for Semi-Supervised Relation Extractioncited by 0
  3. 2024Maximizing Relation Extraction Potential: A Data-Centric Study to Unveil Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 0
  4. 2024Graph-DPEP: Decomposed Plug and Ensemble Play for Few-Shot Document Relation Extraction with Graph-of-Thoughts Reasoningcited by 0
  5. 2026Relational Probing: LM-to-Graph Adaptation for Financial Predictioncited by 0
  6. 2026Lightweight Person-Place Relation Extraction from Historical Newspapers with Dependency Graphs and Proximity Featurescited by 0