mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

NL-FCOS: Improving FCOS through Non-Local Modules for Object Detection

arXiv 2203.15638 ↗First posted 29 Mar 2022cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

During the last years, we have seen significant advances in the object detection task, mainly due to the outperforming results of convolutional neural networks. In this vein, anchor-based models have achieved the best results. However, these models require prior information about the aspect and scales of target objects, needing more hyperparameters to fit. In addition, using anchors to fit bounding boxes seems far from how our visual system does the same visual task. Instead, our visual system uses the interactions of different scene parts to semantically identify objects, called perceptual grouping. An object detection methodology closer to the natural model is anchor-free detection, where models like FCOS or Centernet have shown competitive results, but these have not yet exploited the concept of perceptual grouping. Therefore, to increase the effectiveness of anchor-free models keeping the inference time low, we propose to add non-local attention (NL modules) modules to boost the feature map of the underlying backbone. NL modules implement the perceptual grouping mechanism, allowing receptive fields to cooperate in visual representation learning. We show that non-local modules combined with an FCOS head (NL-FCOS) are practical and efficient. Thus, we establish state-of-the-art performance in clothing detection and handwritten amount recognition problems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Mar 2022.

Builds on

23 of 32 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  5. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  6. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  7. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  8. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
  9. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
  10. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  11. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  12. 2017Non-local Neural Networkscited by 2,290
11 more
  1. 2019EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detectioncited by 1,018
  2. 2018CornerNet: Detecting Objects as Paired Keypointscited by 763
  3. 2019CenterNet: Keypoint Triplets for Object Detectioncited by 654
  4. 2019PANet: Few-Shot Image Semantic Segmentation with Prototype Alignmentcited by 449
  5. 2021Bottleneck Transformers for Visual Recognitioncited by 364
  6. 2020Exploring Self-attention for Image Recognitioncited by 313
  7. 2020FCOS: A simple and strong anchor-free object detectorcited by 171
  8. 2019Scale-Aware Trident Networks for Object Detectioncited by 159
  9. 2021PolyViT: Co-training Vision Transformers on Images, Videos and Audiocited by 58
  10. 2018ModaNet: A Large-Scale Street Fashion Dataset with Polygon Annotationscited by 33
  11. 2020A Comprehensive Comparison of End-to-End Approaches for Handwritten Digit String Recognitioncited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.