mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Equivariance Allows Handling Multiple Nuisance Variables When Analyzing Pooled Neuroimaging Datasets

arXiv 2203.15234 ↗First posted 29 Mar 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pooling multiple neuroimaging datasets across institutions often enables improvements in statistical power when evaluating associations (e.g., between risk factors and disease outcomes) that may otherwise be too weak to detect. When there is only a em single source of variability (e.g., different scanners), domain adaptation and matching the distributions of representations may suffice in many scenarios. But in the presence of em more than one nuisance variable which concurrently influence the measurements, pooling datasets poses unique challenges, e.g., variations in the data can come from both the acquisition method as well as the demographics of participants (gender, age). Invariant representation learning, by itself, is ill-suited to fully model the data generation process. In this paper, we show how bringing recent results on equivariant representation learning (for studying symmetries in neural networks) instantiated on structured spaces together with simple use of classical results on causal inference provides an effective practical solution. In particular, we demonstrate how our model allows dealing with more than one nuisance variable under some assumptions and can enable analysis of pooled scientific datasets in scenarios that would otherwise entail removing a large portion of the samples.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Mar 2022.

Builds on

23 of 59 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
  2. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
  3. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
  4. 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,167
  5. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  6. 2017Unified Deep Supervised Domain Adaptation and Generalizationcited by 323
  7. 2018Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness Constraintscited by 226
  8. 2020Domain Generalization using Causal Matchingcited by 225
  9. 2021Towards Causal Representation Learningcited by 209
  10. 2019Causality matters in medical imagingcited by 193
  11. 2021Generalized Source-free Domain Adaptationcited by 175
  12. 2017Controllable Invariance through Adversarial Feature Learningcited by 127
11 more
  1. 2018Invariant Representations without Adversarial Trainingcited by 112
  2. 2015Simple, Robust and Optimal Ranking from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 70
  3. 2021Adaptive Methods for Real-World Domain Generalizationcited by 66
  4. 2019Competitive Gradient Descentcited by 32
  5. 2021Patterns, predictions, and actions: A story about machine learningcited by 14
  6. 2020Alternating Minimization Converges Super-Linearly for Mixed Linear Regressioncited by 12
  7. 2014Learning unbiased featurescited by 10
  8. 2019Latent Variables on Spheres for Autoencoders in High Dimensionscited by 7
  9. 2020Variational Transport: A Convergent Particle-BasedAlgorithm for Distributional Optimizationcited by 6
  10. 2021Learning Invariant Representations using Inverse Contrastive Losscited by 6
  11. 2017When can Multi-Site Datasets be Pooled for Regression? Hypothesis Tests, ℓ2-consistency and Neuroscience Applicationscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

7 papers.