Learning Invariant Representations using Inverse Contrastive Loss
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning invariant representations is a critical first step in a number of machine learning tasks. A common approach corresponds to the so-called information bottleneck principle in which an application dependent function of mutual information is carefully chosen and optimized. Unfortunately, in practice, these functions are not suitable for optimization purposes since these losses are agnostic of the metric structure of the parameters of the model. We introduce a class of losses for learning representations that are invariant to some extraneous variable of interest by inverting the class of contrastive losses, i.e., inverse contrastive loss (ICL). We show that if the extraneous variable is binary, then optimizing ICL is equivalent to optimizing a regularized MMD divergence. More generally, we also show that if we are provided a metric on the sample space, our formulation of ICL can be decomposed into a sum of convex functions of the given distance metric. Our experimental results indicate that models obtained by optimizing ICL achieve significantly better invariance to the extraneous variable for a fixed desired level of accuracy. In a variety of experimental settings, we show applicability of ICL for learning invariant representations for both continuous and discrete extraneous variables.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2021.
Builds on
12 of 25 references.
References · 12
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
- 2016Deep Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 915
- 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Contrastive Unsupervised Representation Learningcited by 530
- 2018Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness Constraintscited by 226
- 2015The Variational Fair Autoencodercited by 223
- 2017Controllable Invariance through Adversarial Feature Learningcited by 127
- 2018Invariant Representations without Adversarial Trainingcited by 111
- 2019Scanner Invariant Representations for Diffusion MRI Harmonizationcited by 27
- 2020FairALM: Augmented Lagrangian Method for Training Fair Models with Little Regretcited by 22
- 2018Unsupervised Adversarial Invariancecited by 14
- 2014Learning unbiased featurescited by 10
- 2019Unified Adversarial Invariancecited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2022On the Versatile Uses of Partial Distance Correlation in Deep Learningcited by 18
- 2022Equivariance Allows Handling Multiple Nuisance Variables When Analyzing Pooled Neuroimaging Datasetscited by 7
- 2022Intrinsic Anomaly Detection for Multi-Variate Time Seriescited by 2
- 2025Is Exchangeability better than I.I.D to handle Data Distribution Shifts while Pooling Data for Data-scarce Medical image segmentation?cited by 1
- 2026Nearest-Neighbor Density Estimation for Dependency Suppressioncited by 1
- 2022PiRL: Participant-Invariant Representation Learning for Healthcarecited by 0
- 2026Nearest-Neighbor Density Estimation for Dependency Suppression4 Mar 2026
- 2025Is Exchangeability better than I.I.D to handle Data Distribution Shifts while Pooling Data for Data-scarce Medical image segmentation?25 Jul 2025
- 2022PiRL: Participant-Invariant Representation Learning for Healthcare21 Nov 2022
- 2022On the Versatile Uses of Partial Distance Correlation in Deep Learning20 Jul 2022
- 2022Intrinsic Anomaly Detection for Multi-Variate Time Series29 Jun 2022
- 2022Equivariance Allows Handling Multiple Nuisance Variables When Analyzing Pooled Neuroimaging Datasets29 Mar 2022