Deep learning for laboratory earthquake prediction and autoregressive forecasting of fault zone stress
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Earthquake forecasting and prediction have long and in some cases sordid histories but recent work has rekindled interest based on advances in early warning, hazard assessment for induced seismicity and successful prediction of laboratory earthquakes. In the lab, frictional stick-slip events provide an analog for earthquakes and the seismic cycle. Labquakes are ideal targets for machine learning (ML) because they can be produced in long sequences under controlled conditions. Recent works show that ML can predict several aspects of labquakes using fault zone acoustic emissions. Here, we generalize these results and explore deep learning (DL) methods for labquake prediction and autoregressive (AR) forecasting. DL improves existing ML methods of labquake prediction. AR methods allow forecasting at future horizons via iterative predictions. We demonstrate that DL models based on Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) and Convolution Neural Networks predict labquakes under several conditions, and that fault zone stress can be predicted with fidelity, confirming that acoustic energy is a fingerprint of fault zone stress. We predict also time to start of failure (TTsF) and time to the end of Failure (TTeF) for labquakes. Interestingly, TTeF is successfully predicted in all seismic cycles, while the TTsF prediction varies with the amount of preseismic fault creep. We report AR methods to forecast the evolution of fault stress using three sequence modeling frameworks: LSTM, Temporal Convolution Network and Transformer Network. AR forecasting is distinct from existing predictive models, which predict only a target variable at a specific time. The results for forecasting beyond a single seismic cycle are limited but encouraging. Our ML/DL models outperform the state-of-the-art and our autoregressive model represents a novel framework that could enhance current methods of earthquake forecasting.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2022.
Builds on
4 of 62 references.
References · 4
- 2018An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,447
- 2020Transformer Networks for Trajectory Forecastingcited by 180
- 2019CNNs found to jump around more skillfully than RNNs: Compositional generalization in seq2seq convolutional networkscited by 22
- 2019Attention network forecasts time-to-failure in laboratory shear experimentscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Cross-Domain Foundation Model Adaptation: Pioneering Computer Vision Models for Geophysical Data Analysiscited by 4
- 2024Deep Learning Forecasts Caldera Collapse Events at Kilauea Volcanocited by 0
- 2025Remotely sensing stress evolution in elastic media: a passive approach to earthquake monitoringcited by 0
- 2026Machine learning for sustainable geoenergy: uncertainty, physics and decision-ready inferencecited by 0
- 2026Machine learning for sustainable geoenergy: uncertainty, physics and decision-ready inference16 Mar 2026
- 2025Remotely sensing stress evolution in elastic media: a passive approach to earthquake monitoring29 Aug 2025
- 2024Cross-Domain Foundation Model Adaptation: Pioneering Computer Vision Models for Geophysical Data Analysis22 Aug 2024
- 2024Deep Learning Forecasts Caldera Collapse Events at Kilauea Volcano30 Apr 2024