mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

NPC: Neuron Path Coverage via Characterizing Decision Logic of Deep Neural Networks

arXiv 2203.12915 ↗First posted 24 Mar 2022cs.LG cs.CV cs.SEcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning has recently been widely applied to many applications across different domains, e.g., image classification and audio recognition. However, the quality of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) still raises concerns in the practical operational environment, which calls for systematic testing, especially in safety-critical scenarios. Inspired by software testing, a number of structural coverage criteria are designed and proposed to measure the test adequacy of DNNs. However, due to the blackbox nature of DNN, the existing structural coverage criteria are difficult to interpret, making it hard to understand the underlying principles of these criteria. The relationship between the structural coverage and the decision logic of DNNs is unknown. Moreover, recent studies have further revealed the non-existence of correlation between the structural coverage and DNN defect detection, which further posts concerns on what a suitable DNN testing criterion should be. In this paper, we propose the interpretable coverage criteria through constructing the decision structure of a DNN. Mirroring the control flow graph of the traditional program, we first extract a decision graph from a DNN based on its interpretation, where a path of the decision graph represents a decision logic of the DNN. Based on the control flow and data flow of the decision graph, we propose two variants of path coverage to measure the adequacy of the test cases in exercising the decision logic. The higher the path coverage, the more diverse decision logic the DNN is expected to be explored. Our large-scale evaluation results demonstrate that: the path in the decision graph is effective in characterizing the decision of the DNN, and the proposed coverage criteria are also sensitive with errors including natural errors and adversarial examples, and strongly correlated with the output impartiality.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2022.

Builds on

27 of 57 references.

References · 27

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  4. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  5. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  6. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
  7. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
  8. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
  9. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
  10. 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 611
  11. 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 307
  12. 2017DeepTest: Automated Testing of Deep-Neural-Network-driven Autonomous Carscited by 249
15 more
  1. 2019Machine Learning Testing: Survey, Landscapes and Horizonscited by 213
  2. 2018DeepGauge: Multi-Granularity Testing Criteria for Deep Learning Systemscited by 144
  3. 2018Guiding Deep Learning System Testing using Surprise Adequacycited by 123
  4. 2018TensorFuzz: Debugging Neural Networks with Coverage-Guided Fuzzingcited by 67
  5. 2018DeepMutation: Mutation Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 66
  6. 2018Concolic Testing for Deep Neural Networkscited by 51
  7. 2017Automatically Generating Commit Messages from Diffs using Neural Machine Translationcited by 42
  8. 2021AVA: Adversarial Vignetting Attack against Visual Recognitioncited by 29
  9. 2019Test Selection for Deep Learning Systemscited by 27
  10. 2020Towards Characterizing Adversarial Defects of Deep Learning Software from the Lens of Uncertaintycited by 26
  11. 2020Importance-Driven Deep Learning System Testingcited by 24
  12. 2021Self-Checking Deep Neural Networks in Deploymentcited by 18
  13. 2020Pasadena: Perceptually Aware and Stealthy Adversarial Denoise Attackcited by 14
  14. 2019There is Limited Correlation between Coverage and Robustness for Deep Neural Networkscited by 8
  15. 2019Towards Improved Testing For Deep Learningcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 9; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

17 papers.

Sort: