Multilingual CheckList: Generation and Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multilingual evaluation benchmarks usually contain limited high-resource languages and do not test models for specific linguistic capabilities. CheckList is a template-based evaluation approach that tests models for specific capabilities. The CheckList template creation process requires native speakers, posing a challenge in scaling to hundreds of languages. In this work, we explore multiple approaches to generate Multilingual CheckLists. We device an algorithm - Template Extraction Algorithm (TEA) for automatically extracting target language CheckList templates from machine translated instances of a source language templates. We compare the TEA CheckLists with CheckLists created with different levels of human intervention. We further introduce metrics along the dimensions of cost, diversity, utility, and correctness to compare the CheckLists. We thoroughly analyze different approaches to creating CheckLists in Hindi. Furthermore, we experiment with 9 more different languages. We find that TEA followed by human verification is ideal for scaling Checklist-based evaluation to multiple languages while TEA gives a good estimates of model performance.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2022.
Builds on
21 of 33 references.
References · 21
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
- 2020mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformercited by 1,813
- 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,028
- 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
- 2018XNLI: Evaluating Cross-lingual Sentence Representationscited by 913
- 2020XTREME: A Massively Multilingual Multi-task Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-lingual Generalizationcited by 738
- 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 656
- 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 447
- 2020Measuring and Reducing Gendered Correlations in Pre-trained Modelscited by 222
- 2020XGLUE: A New Benchmark Dataset for Cross-lingual Pre-training, Understanding and Generationcited by 221
9 more
- 2019Are We Modeling the Task or the Annotator? An Investigation of Annotator Bias in Natural Language Understanding Datasetscited by 173
- 2021XTREME-R: Towards More Challenging and Nuanced Multilingual Evaluationcited by 167
- 2018Breaking NLI Systems with Sentences that Require Simple Lexical Inferencescited by 134
- 2020Extending Multilingual BERT to Low-Resource Languagescited by 88
- 2018Performance Impact Caused by Hidden Bias of Training Data for Recognizing Textual Entailmentcited by 58
- 2020Multi-SimLex: A Large-Scale Evaluation of Multilingual and Cross-Lingual Lexical Semantic Similaritycited by 38
- 2020TaxiNLI: Taking a Ride up the NLU Hillcited by 27
- 2021Trusting RoBERTa over BERT: Insights from CheckListing the Natural Language Inference Taskcited by 8
- 2021On the Universality of Deep Contextual Language Modelscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
2 papers.