mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Planning Landscape Analysis for Self-Adaptive Systems

arXiv 2203.12472 ↗First posted 23 Mar 2022cs.SE cs.AIcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To assure performance on the fly, planning is arguably one of the most important steps for self-adaptive systems (SASs), especially when they are highly configurable with a daunting number of adaptation options. However, there has been little understanding of the planning landscape or ways by which it can be analyzed. This inevitably creates barriers to the design of better and tailored planners for SASs. In this paper, we showcase how the planning landscapes of SASs can be quantified and reasoned, particularly with respect to the different environments. By studying four diverse real-world SASs and 14 environments, we found that (1) the SAS planning landscapes often provide strong guidance to the planner, but their ruggedness and multi-modality can be the major obstacle; (2) the extents of guidance and number of global/local optima are sensitive to the changing environment, but not the ruggedness of the surface; (3) the local optima are often closer to the global optimum than other random points; and (4) there are considerable (and useful) overlaps on the global/local optima between landscapes under different environments. We then discuss the potential implications to the future work of planner designs for SASs.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2022.

Builds on

16 of 51 references.

References · 16

  1. 2018Finding Faster Configurations using FLASHcited by 32
  2. 2021Multi-Objectivizing Software Configuration Tuning (for a single performance concern)cited by 28
  3. 2017Transfer Learning for Performance Modeling of Configurable Systems: An Exploratory Analysiscited by 20
  4. 2021MMO: Meta Multi-Objectivization for Software Configuration Tuningcited by 20
  5. 2016FEMOSAA: Feature Guided and Knee Driven Multi-Objective Optimization for Self-Adaptive Softwarecited by 18
  6. 2016A Survey and Taxonomy of Self-Aware and Self-Adaptive Cloud Autoscaling Systemscited by 18
  7. 2016An Uncertainty-Aware Approach to Optimal Configuration of Stream Processing Systemscited by 17
  8. 2016Self-Adaptive Trade-off Decision Making for Autoscaling Cloud-Based Servicescited by 17
  9. 2020BiLO-CPDP: Bi-Level Programming for Automated Model Discovery in Cross-Project Defect Predictioncited by 16
  10. 2022Lifelong Dynamic Optimization for Self-Adaptive Systems: Fact or Fiction?cited by 16
  11. 2020TrimTuner: Efficient Optimization of Machine Learning Jobs in the Cloud via Sub-Samplingcited by 12
  12. 2020Synergizing Domain Expertise with Self-Awareness in Software Systems: A Patternized Architecture Guidelinecited by 9
4 more
  1. 2020DATESSO: Self-Adapting Service Composition with Debt-Aware Two Levels Constraint Reasoningcited by 9
  2. 2019Planning as Optimization: Dynamically Discovering Optimal Configurations for Runtime Situationscited by 3
  3. 2020Towards Bridging the Gap between Control and Self-Adaptive System Propertiescited by 1
  4. 2022Unlocking the Secrets of Software Configuration Landscapes-Ruggedness, Accessibility, Escapability, and Transferabilitycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

12 papers.