Self-Adaptive Trade-off Decision Making for Autoscaling Cloud-Based Services
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Elasticity in the cloud is often achieved by on-demand autoscaling. In such context, the goal is to optimize the Quality of Service (QoS) and cost objectives for the cloud-based services. However, the difficulty lies in the facts that these objectives, e.g., throughput and cost, can be naturally conflicted, and the QoS of cloud-based services often interfere due to the shared infrastructure in cloud. Consequently, dynamic and effective trade-off decision making of autoscaling in the cloud is necessary, yet challenging. In particular, it is even harder to achieve well-compromised trade-offs, where the decision largely improves the majority of the objectives, while causing relatively small degradations to others. In this paper, we present a self-adaptive decision making approach for autoscaling in the cloud. It is capable to adaptively produce autoscaling decisions that lead to well-compromised trade-offs without heavy human intervention. We leverage on ant colony inspired multi-objective optimization for searching and optimizing the trade-offs decisions, the result is then filtered by compromise-dominance, a mechanism that extracts the decisions with balanced improvements in the trade-offs. We experimentally compare our approach to four state-of-the-arts autoscaling approaches: rule, heuristic, randomized and multi-objective genetic algorithm based solutions. The results reveal the effectiveness of our approach over the others, including better quality of trade-offs and significantly smaller violation of the requirements.
Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 6.
17 papers.
Sort:
- 2021Multi-Objectivizing Software Configuration Tuning (for a single performance concern)cited by 27
- 2023Do Performance Aspirations Matter for Guiding Software Configuration Tuning?cited by 21
- 2021MMO: Meta Multi-Objectivization for Software Configuration Tuningcited by 19
- 2022The Weights can be Harmful: Pareto Search versus Weighted Search in Multi-Objective Search-Based Software Engineeringcited by 17
- 2024Predicting Configuration Performance in Multiple Environments with Sequential Meta-learningcited by 17
- 2022Lifelong Dynamic Optimization for Self-Adaptive Systems: Fact or Fiction?cited by 16
- 2024Adapting Multi-objectivized Software Configuration Tuningcited by 13
- 2022Planning Landscape Analysis for Self-Adaptive Systemscited by 12
- 2025Distilled Lifelong Self-Adaptation for Configurable Systemscited by 11
- 2022Does Configuration Encoding Matter in Learning Software Performance? An Empirical Study on Encoding Schemescited by 10
- 2025Faster Configuration Performance Bug Testing with Neural Dual-level Prioritizationcited by 9
- 2024Deep Configuration Performance Learning: A Systematic Survey and Taxonomycited by 8
5 more
- 2025Dually Hierarchical Drift Adaptation for Online Configuration Performance Learningcited by 7
- 2025Learning Software Bug Reports: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 3
- 2025CoTune: Co-evolutionary Configuration Tuningcited by 2
- 2025Light over Heavy: Automated Performance Requirements Quantification with Linguistic Inducementcited by 2
- 2024Contexts Matter: An Empirical Study on Contextual Influence in Fairness Testing for Deep Learning Systemscited by 0
- 2025Light over Heavy: Automated Performance Requirements Quantification with Linguistic Inducement5 Nov 2025
- 2025CoTune: Co-evolutionary Configuration Tuning29 Sep 2025
- 2025Dually Hierarchical Drift Adaptation for Online Configuration Performance Learning11 Jul 2025
- 2025Learning Software Bug Reports: A Systematic Literature Review6 Jul 2025
- 2025Faster Configuration Performance Bug Testing with Neural Dual-level Prioritization26 Jan 2025
- 2025Distilled Lifelong Self-Adaptation for Configurable Systems1 Jan 2025
- 2024Contexts Matter: An Empirical Study on Contextual Influence in Fairness Testing for Deep Learning Systems12 Aug 2024
- 2024Adapting Multi-objectivized Software Configuration Tuning6 Apr 2024
- 2024Deep Configuration Performance Learning: A Systematic Survey and Taxonomy5 Mar 2024
- 2024Predicting Configuration Performance in Multiple Environments with Sequential Meta-learning5 Feb 2024
- 2023Do Performance Aspirations Matter for Guiding Software Configuration Tuning?9 Jan 2023
- 2022Does Configuration Encoding Matter in Learning Software Performance? An Empirical Study on Encoding Schemes30 Mar 2022
5 more
- 2022Planning Landscape Analysis for Self-Adaptive Systems23 Mar 2022
- 2022The Weights can be Harmful: Pareto Search versus Weighted Search in Multi-Objective Search-Based Software Engineering8 Feb 2022
- 2022Lifelong Dynamic Optimization for Self-Adaptive Systems: Fact or Fiction?18 Jan 2022
- 2021MMO: Meta Multi-Objectivization for Software Configuration Tuning14 Dec 2021
- 2021Multi-Objectivizing Software Configuration Tuning (for a single performance concern)31 May 2021
- 2021Multi-Objectivizing Software Configuration Tuning (for a single performance concern)cited by 27
- 2023Do Performance Aspirations Matter for Guiding Software Configuration Tuning?cited by 21
- 2021MMO: Meta Multi-Objectivization for Software Configuration Tuningcited by 19
- 2022The Weights can be Harmful: Pareto Search versus Weighted Search in Multi-Objective Search-Based Software Engineeringcited by 17
- 2024Predicting Configuration Performance in Multiple Environments with Sequential Meta-learningcited by 17
- 2022Lifelong Dynamic Optimization for Self-Adaptive Systems: Fact or Fiction?cited by 16
- 2024Adapting Multi-objectivized Software Configuration Tuningcited by 13
- 2022Planning Landscape Analysis for Self-Adaptive Systemscited by 12
- 2025Distilled Lifelong Self-Adaptation for Configurable Systemscited by 11
- 2022Does Configuration Encoding Matter in Learning Software Performance? An Empirical Study on Encoding Schemescited by 10
- 2025Faster Configuration Performance Bug Testing with Neural Dual-level Prioritizationcited by 9
- 2024Deep Configuration Performance Learning: A Systematic Survey and Taxonomycited by 8
12 most cited of 17 All 17 (JSON)
- 2025Light over Heavy: Automated Performance Requirements Quantification with Linguistic Inducement5 Nov 2025
- 2025CoTune: Co-evolutionary Configuration Tuning29 Sep 2025
- 2025Dually Hierarchical Drift Adaptation for Online Configuration Performance Learning11 Jul 2025
- 2025Learning Software Bug Reports: A Systematic Literature Review6 Jul 2025
- 2025Faster Configuration Performance Bug Testing with Neural Dual-level Prioritization26 Jan 2025
- 2025Distilled Lifelong Self-Adaptation for Configurable Systems1 Jan 2025
- 2024Contexts Matter: An Empirical Study on Contextual Influence in Fairness Testing for Deep Learning Systems12 Aug 2024
- 2024Adapting Multi-objectivized Software Configuration Tuning6 Apr 2024
- 2024Deep Configuration Performance Learning: A Systematic Survey and Taxonomy5 Mar 2024
- 2024Predicting Configuration Performance in Multiple Environments with Sequential Meta-learning5 Feb 2024
- 2023Do Performance Aspirations Matter for Guiding Software Configuration Tuning?9 Jan 2023
- 2022Does Configuration Encoding Matter in Learning Software Performance? An Empirical Study on Encoding Schemes30 Mar 2022
12 newest of 17 All 17 (JSON)