mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Phase Recognition in Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans based on Deep Learning and Random Sampling

arXiv 2203.11206 ↗First posted 20 Mar 2022eess.IV cs.CVcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A fully automated system for interpreting abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans with multiple phases of contrast enhancement requires an accurate classification of the phases. This work aims at developing and validating a precise, fast multi-phase classifier to recognize three main types of contrast phases in abdominal CT scans. We propose in this study a novel method that uses a random sampling mechanism on top of deep CNNs for the phase recognition of abdominal CT scans of four different phases: non-contrast, arterial, venous, and others. The CNNs work as a slice-wise phase prediction, while the random sampling selects input slices for the CNN models. Afterward, majority voting synthesizes the slice-wise results of the CNNs, to provide the final prediction at scan level. Our classifier was trained on 271,426 slices from 830 phase-annotated CT scans, and when combined with majority voting on 30% of slices randomly chosen from each scan, achieved a mean F1-score of 92.09% on our internal test set of 358 scans. The proposed method was also evaluated on 2 external test sets: CTPAC-CCRCC (N = 242) and LiTS (N = 131), which were annotated by our experts. Although a drop in performance has been observed, the model performance remained at a high level of accuracy with a mean F1-score of 76.79% and 86.94% on CTPAC-CCRCC and LiTS datasets, respectively. Our experimental results also showed that the proposed method significantly outperformed the state-of-the-art 3D approaches while requiring less computation time for inference.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2022.

Builds on

15 of 40 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  4. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  5. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  6. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  7. 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,182
  8. 2019The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)cited by 504
  9. 2018Bag of Tricks for Image Classification with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 430
  10. 2019GhostNet: More Features from Cheap Operationscited by 410
  11. 2020The Real-World-Weight Cross-Entropy Loss Function: Modeling the Costs of Mislabelingcited by 64
  12. 2019On the adequacy of untuned warmup for adaptive optimizationcited by 35
3 more
  1. 2020Generalizability issues with deep learning models in medicine and their potential solutions: illustrated with Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) to Computed Tomography (CT) image conversioncited by 6
  2. 2019CT Data Curation for Liver Patients: Phase Recognition in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced CTcited by 3
  3. 2019Contrast Phase Classification with a Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

10 papers.