Generalizability issues with deep learning models in medicine and their potential solutions: illustrated with Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) to Computed Tomography (CT) image conversion
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generalizability is a concern when applying a deep learning (DL) model trained on one dataset to other datasets. Training a universal model that works anywhere, anytime, for anybody is unrealistic. In this work, we demonstrate the generalizability problem, then explore potential solutions based on transfer learning (TL) by using the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to computed tomography (CT) image conversion task as the testbed. Previous works have converted CBCT to CT-like images. However, all of those works studied only one or two anatomical sites and used images from the same vendor's scanners. Here, we investigated how a model trained for one machine and one anatomical site works on other machines and other sites. We trained a model on CBCT images acquired from one vendor's scanners for head and neck cancer patients and applied it to images from another vendor's scanners and for other disease sites. We found that generalizability could be a significant problem for this particular application when applying a trained DL model to datasets from another vendor's scanners. We then explored three practical solutions based on TL to solve this generalization problem: the target model, which is trained on a target domain from scratch; the combined model, which is trained on both source and target domain datasets from scratch; and the adapted model, which fine-tunes the trained source model to a target domain. We found that when there are sufficient data in the target domain, all three models can achieve good performance. When the target dataset is limited, the adapted model works the best, which indicates that using the fine-tuning strategy to adapt the trained model to an unseen target domain dataset is a viable and easy way to implement DL models in the clinic.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 3.
6 papers.
- 2022Phase Recognition in Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans based on Deep Learning and Random Samplingcited by 10
- 2021Multitask 3D CBCT-to-CT Translation and Organs-at-Risk Segmentation Using Physics-Based Data Augmentationcited by 6
- 2024Imaging foundation model for universal enhancement of non-ideal measurement CTcited by 6
- 2022Performance Deterioration of Deep Learning Models after Clinical Deployment: A Case Study with Auto-segmentation for Definitive Prostate Cancer Radiotherapycited by 2
- 2024Analyzing mixed construction and demolition waste in material recovery facilities: evolution, challenges, and applications of computer vision and deep learningcited by 1
- 2024SinoSynth: A Physics-based Domain Randomization Approach for Generalizable CBCT Image Enhancementcited by 1
- 2024Imaging foundation model for universal enhancement of non-ideal measurement CT2 Oct 2024
- 2024SinoSynth: A Physics-based Domain Randomization Approach for Generalizable CBCT Image Enhancement27 Sep 2024
- 2024Analyzing mixed construction and demolition waste in material recovery facilities: evolution, challenges, and applications of computer vision and deep learning19 Sep 2024
- 2022Performance Deterioration of Deep Learning Models after Clinical Deployment: A Case Study with Auto-segmentation for Definitive Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy11 Oct 2022
- 2022Phase Recognition in Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans based on Deep Learning and Random Sampling20 Mar 2022
- 2021Multitask 3D CBCT-to-CT Translation and Organs-at-Risk Segmentation Using Physics-Based Data Augmentation9 Mar 2021